From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 24973 invoked by alias); 10 Apr 2007 15:33:55 -0000 Received: (qmail 24959 invoked by uid 22791); 10 Apr 2007 15:33:53 -0000 X-Spam-Check-By: sourceware.org Received: from wr-out-0506.google.com (HELO wr-out-0506.google.com) (64.233.184.224) by sourceware.org (qpsmtpd/0.31) with ESMTP; Tue, 10 Apr 2007 16:33:43 +0100 Received: by wr-out-0506.google.com with SMTP id 37so1289669wra for ; Tue, 10 Apr 2007 08:33:42 -0700 (PDT) Received: by 10.114.53.1 with SMTP id b1mr2811675waa.1176219220590; Tue, 10 Apr 2007 08:33:40 -0700 (PDT) Received: by 10.114.149.5 with HTTP; Tue, 10 Apr 2007 08:33:40 -0700 (PDT) Message-ID: <4aca3dc20704100833h470e7ba6xcf4aee76df625b8d@mail.gmail.com> Date: Tue, 10 Apr 2007 15:33:00 -0000 From: "Daniel Berlin" To: "Brooks Moses" Subject: Re: Patch tracker problems ("`gsub' called for nil:NilClass") Cc: overseers@gcc.gnu.org In-Reply-To: <4.3.1.2.20070409211449.0212d090@cits1.stanford.edu> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Content-Disposition: inline References: <4.3.1.2.20070409211449.0212d090@cits1.stanford.edu> Mailing-List: contact overseers-help@sourceware.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Id: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: , Sender: overseers-owner@sourceware.org X-SW-Source: 2007-q2/txt/msg00018.txt.bz2 On 4/10/07, Brooks Moses wrote: > Daniel - > > I'm trying to add the following four patches to the tracker, but I keep > getting an error of "Maillist url private method `gsub' called for > nil:NilClass" from the http://www.dberlin.org/patches/patches/create page. > > http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-patches/2007-04/msg00293.html > http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-patches/2007-04/msg00289.html > http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-patches/2007-04/msg00286.html > http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-patches/2007-04/msg00288.html They aren't in the raw message queue for some reason. The parser grabs the raw message using the "raw text" link that exists on each page. Overseers, any idea why these messages haven't made it into the raw message archive?