From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 22255 invoked by alias); 31 May 2007 13:25:12 -0000 Received: (qmail 22243 invoked by uid 22791); 31 May 2007 13:25:11 -0000 X-Spam-Check-By: sourceware.org Received: from wa-out-1112.google.com (HELO wa-out-1112.google.com) (209.85.146.181) by sourceware.org (qpsmtpd/0.31) with ESMTP; Thu, 31 May 2007 13:25:05 +0000 Received: by wa-out-1112.google.com with SMTP id n4so250420wag for ; Thu, 31 May 2007 06:25:03 -0700 (PDT) Received: by 10.114.153.18 with SMTP id a18mr570326wae.1180617902782; Thu, 31 May 2007 06:25:02 -0700 (PDT) Received: by 10.115.91.12 with HTTP; Thu, 31 May 2007 06:25:02 -0700 (PDT) Message-ID: <4aca3dc20705310625s399ecf9flc16557a015b027f3@mail.gmail.com> Date: Thu, 31 May 2007 13:25:00 -0000 From: "Daniel Berlin" To: overseers@gcc.gnu.org Subject: Bugzilla 3.0 and mod_perl MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Content-Disposition: inline Mailing-List: contact overseers-help@sourceware.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Id: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: , Sender: overseers-owner@sourceware.org X-SW-Source: 2007-q2/txt/msg00075.txt.bz2 I'm going to be upgrading our bugzilla installs to 3.0 in a few weeks One of the nicer features is that you can run multiple db's from one bugzilla install, so i can eliminate the need for the two copies we have now. Bugzilla 3.0 also supports running under mod_perl. Under mod_perl, the cpu usage is *greatly* decreased, but the memory usage is heavily increased. My guess is that it would take 100-200 meg of memory in process in our httpds. I'm not sure whether this is a good tradeoff for us. Thoughts?