From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 21490 invoked by alias); 29 Sep 2007 05:26:30 -0000 Received: (qmail 21481 invoked by uid 22791); 29 Sep 2007 05:26:30 -0000 X-Spam-Check-By: sourceware.org Received: from wa-out-1112.google.com (HELO wa-out-1112.google.com) (209.85.146.177) by sourceware.org (qpsmtpd/0.31) with ESMTP; Sat, 29 Sep 2007 05:26:28 +0000 Received: by wa-out-1112.google.com with SMTP id m16so3753435waf for ; Fri, 28 Sep 2007 22:26:26 -0700 (PDT) Received: by 10.115.109.1 with SMTP id l1mr824314wam.1191043586176; Fri, 28 Sep 2007 22:26:26 -0700 (PDT) Received: by 10.114.149.7 with HTTP; Fri, 28 Sep 2007 22:26:26 -0700 (PDT) Message-ID: <4aca3dc20709282226j66acf6c0w4ba70712d8edf306@mail.gmail.com> Date: Sat, 29 Sep 2007 05:26:00 -0000 From: "Daniel Berlin" To: NightStrike Subject: Re: [NightStrike ] SVN access over https (SSL) Cc: "Ian Lance Taylor" , overseers@gcc.gnu.org In-Reply-To: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Content-Disposition: inline References: <4aca3dc20709281741j346345bs8fd4ad1fb9967e99@mail.gmail.com> <4aca3dc20709281900g4db8af17hae1bca68bf85e51d@mail.gmail.com> Mailing-List: contact overseers-help@sourceware.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Id: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: , Sender: overseers-owner@sourceware.org X-SW-Source: 2007-q3/txt/msg00140.txt.bz2 On 9/29/07, NightStrike wrote: > On 9/28/07, Daniel Berlin wrote: > > Most people who proxy https proxy http as well. > > proxy https is much more compatible with picky proxies than http when > dealing with svn. > Being an svn developer who has had to debug proxy problems, i'd actually say exactly the exact opposite. Most HTTPS proxies fuck it up more often than HTTP proxies. In any case, if someone wants to buy a cert for gcc.gnu.org, i'll set up https read-only access. But honestly, I have real trouble seeing that it is truly that useful when we have http access. --Dan