From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 9504 invoked by alias); 30 Sep 2007 20:22:55 -0000 Received: (qmail 9495 invoked by uid 22791); 30 Sep 2007 20:22:55 -0000 X-Spam-Check-By: sourceware.org Received: from nz-out-0506.google.com (HELO nz-out-0506.google.com) (64.233.162.233) by sourceware.org (qpsmtpd/0.31) with ESMTP; Sun, 30 Sep 2007 20:22:53 +0000 Received: by nz-out-0506.google.com with SMTP id s1so8346196nze for ; Sun, 30 Sep 2007 13:22:51 -0700 (PDT) Received: by 10.114.56.1 with SMTP id e1mr867050waa.1191183770786; Sun, 30 Sep 2007 13:22:50 -0700 (PDT) Received: by 10.114.149.7 with HTTP; Sun, 30 Sep 2007 13:22:50 -0700 (PDT) Message-ID: <4aca3dc20709301322k3bee56f4uf392b937b5b98945@mail.gmail.com> Date: Sun, 30 Sep 2007 20:22:00 -0000 From: "Daniel Berlin" To: NightStrike Subject: Re: [NightStrike ] SVN access over https (SSL) Cc: "Ian Lance Taylor" , overseers@gcc.gnu.org In-Reply-To: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Content-Disposition: inline References: <4aca3dc20709281741j346345bs8fd4ad1fb9967e99@mail.gmail.com> <4aca3dc20709281900g4db8af17hae1bca68bf85e51d@mail.gmail.com> <4aca3dc20709282226j66acf6c0w4ba70712d8edf306@mail.gmail.com> <4aca3dc20709290702r286998e8v9d1f1960158c44af@mail.gmail.com> Mailing-List: contact overseers-help@sourceware.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Id: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: , Sender: overseers-owner@sourceware.org X-SW-Source: 2007-q3/txt/msg00144.txt.bz2 On 9/29/07, NightStrike wrote: > On 9/29/07, Daniel Berlin wrote: > > On 9/29/07, NightStrike wrote: > > > On 9/29/07, Daniel Berlin wrote: > > > > In any case, if someone wants to buy a cert for gcc.gnu.org, i'll set > > > > up https read-only access. > > > > But honestly, I have real trouble seeing that it is truly that useful > > > > when we have http access. > > > > > > How much does it cost? Also, does gnu.org itself not have one? You > > > could also just make one yourself and make gnu.org be the CA :) > > > > > > > probably $100 a year. > > > > If we made one ourselves, we'd have to deal with all the questions > > about accepting the cert, since the CA would not be in anyone's > > trusted roots. > > Ah, I thought it was a one-time thing. Does gnu.org not already have > one? Dunno if the have a wildcard cert (IE *.gnu.org) Anyone else know? >If it let me actually use svn through the ultra-lame proxy at my > workplace, I'd consider paying for it.