Re: Upgrade Gnatsweb on sources

[Yngve Svendsen <yngve.svendsen@clustra.com>]

At 12:14 09.05.2001 +0200, Gerald Pfeifer wrote:
>The upgrade might be especially important as sources.redhat.com and
>gcc.gnu.org seem to suffer the problem that resulted from updating
>on of the perl modules (where you provided a fix for the problem
>recently).
>
>Apart from that, I think it's a good idea to start ``from scratch''
>on sources.redhat.com, and after a few weeks I'd also migrate that
>version to gcc.gnu.org (and add those changes I have specially marked
>there locally).
>
>On the other hand, I am very sure that we made a couple of changes to
>the installations on sources.redhat.com and gcc.gnu.org which did *not*
>make it into 2.8.0; specifically, I believe nearly all of those changes
>that I applied to the head of the gnatsweb tree are missing (most of
>which should apply to the old version as well, as I had originally
>developed and tested them on gcc.gnu.org).

All the applicable changes recorded in the ChangeLog of HEAD have been 
ported to 2.8.0. However, there is obviously a gap in the ChangeLog between 
November 1999 and December 2000. Are you referring to changes made in that 
period?

If you see anything that could be usefully included in Gnatsweb 2.x, tell 
me, as I have plans to make a 2.8.1 release fairly shortly since I think we 
need to incorporate the fix for CGI.pm in a released version.

- Yngve