From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from gnu.wildebeest.org (gnu.wildebeest.org [45.83.234.184]) by sourceware.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 9AE833857C50 for ; Thu, 5 May 2022 13:50:48 +0000 (GMT) DMARC-Filter: OpenDMARC Filter v1.4.1 sourceware.org 9AE833857C50 Received: from tarox.wildebeest.org (83-87-18-245.cable.dynamic.v4.ziggo.nl [83.87.18.245]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher AECDH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by gnu.wildebeest.org (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 548D03000340; Thu, 5 May 2022 15:50:44 +0200 (CEST) Received: by tarox.wildebeest.org (Postfix, from userid 1000) id 68510413CC77; Thu, 5 May 2022 15:50:43 +0200 (CEST) Message-ID: <500a23c2698a5a8913d27e7e74bc3ea8d4e2c085.camel@klomp.org> Subject: Re: Request from Ondrej Kubanek From: Mark Wielaard To: Overseers mailing list Cc: kubanek0ondrej@gmail.com, honza.hubicka@gmail.com Date: Thu, 05 May 2022 15:50:43 +0200 In-Reply-To: <20220504181348.A98633858418@sourceware.org> References: <20220504181348.A98633858418@sourceware.org> Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable X-Mailer: Evolution 3.28.5 (3.28.5-10.el7) Mime-Version: 1.0 X-Spam-Status: No, score=-3.7 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00, JMQ_SPF_NEUTRAL, KAM_DMARC_STATUS, SPF_HELO_NONE, SPF_PASS, TXREP, T_SCC_BODY_TEXT_LINE autolearn=no autolearn_force=no version=3.4.4 X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.4 (2020-01-24) on server2.sourceware.org X-BeenThere: overseers@sourceware.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29 Precedence: list List-Id: Overseers mailing list List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 05 May 2022 13:50:51 -0000 Hi, On Wed, 2022-05-04 at 18:13 +0000, kubanek0ondrej--- via Overseers wrote: > Ondrej Kubanek is requesting an account: >=20 > Login: kubaneko > Email: kubanek0ondrej@gmail.com > Project: gcc > Approver: honza.hubicka@gmail.com Sorry for being a little pedantic here. But since anybody can create a gmail address, the approver email address really needs to match the address in the gcc MAINTAINERS file. Please reapply using that. Thanks, Mark