From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Return-Path: <overseers-return-12038-listarch-overseers=sources.redhat.com@sourceware.org>
Received: (qmail 1002 invoked by alias); 18 Sep 2012 15:37:03 -0000
Received: (qmail 921 invoked by uid 22791); 18 Sep 2012 15:37:02 -0000
X-SWARE-Spam-Status: No, hits=-1.6 required=5.0
	tests=AWL,BAYES_00,KHOP_RCVD_UNTRUST,KHOP_THREADED,RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW
X-Spam-Check-By: sourceware.org
Received: from service87.mimecast.com (HELO service87.mimecast.com) (91.220.42.44)
    by sourceware.org (qpsmtpd/0.43rc1) with ESMTP; Tue, 18 Sep 2012 15:36:49 +0000
Received: from cam-owa2.Emea.Arm.com (fw-tnat.cambridge.arm.com
 [217.140.96.21]) by service87.mimecast.com; Tue, 18 Sep 2012 16:36:47 +0100
Received: from [10.1.69.67] ([10.1.255.212]) by cam-owa2.Emea.Arm.com with Microsoft SMTPSVC(6.0.3790.3959);
	 Tue, 18 Sep 2012 16:36:45 +0100
Message-ID: <5058950D.2090003@arm.com>
Date: Tue, 18 Sep 2012 15:37:00 -0000
From: Richard Earnshaw <rearnsha@arm.com>
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux i686 on x86_64; rv:13.0) Gecko/20120614 Thunderbird/13.0.1
MIME-Version: 1.0
To: Yufeng Zhang <Yufeng.Zhang@arm.com>
CC: "overseers@sourceware.org" <overseers@sourceware.org>, 
 "nickc@redhat.com" <nickc@redhat.com>
Subject: Re: Request for "binutils" cvs write access
References: <50582FEA.9080508@arm.com>
In-Reply-To: <50582FEA.9080508@arm.com>
X-MC-Unique: 112091816364715801
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=WINDOWS-1252
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
Mailing-List: contact overseers-help@sourceware.org; run by ezmlm
Precedence: bulk
List-Id: <overseers.sourceware.org>
List-Archive: <http://sourceware.org/ml/overseers/>
List-Post: <mailto:overseers@sourceware.org>
List-Help: <mailto:overseers-help@sourceware.org>,
	<http://sourceware.org/ml/#faqs>
Sender: overseers-owner@sourceware.org
X-SW-Source: 2012-q3/txt/msg00137.txt.bz2

On 18/09/12 09:25, Yufeng Zhang wrote:
> Hi,
>=20
> I'd like to request for the write after approval access to the binutils=20
> cvs repo.  I have been actively working on the AArch64 binutils port, so=
=20
> it will be a lot more convenient if I have the write access to it.  Many=
=20
> thanks!
>=20
>=20
> Kind regards,
> Yufeng Zhang
>=20
> (Nick and Richard, sorry for bombarding your mailbox with numerous=20
> request emails; this will be the last one and the one with no error)
>=20


Nick, I think this would be a good step, but I think it's your call.

R.