From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 32158 invoked by alias); 6 Mar 2013 16:49:24 -0000 Received: (qmail 32150 invoked by uid 22791); 6 Mar 2013 16:49:21 -0000 X-SWARE-Spam-Status: No, hits=-8.0 required=5.0 tests=AWL,BAYES_00,KHOP_RCVD_UNTRUST,KHOP_SPAMHAUS_DROP,KHOP_THREADED,RCVD_IN_DNSWL_HI,RCVD_IN_HOSTKARMA_W,RP_MATCHES_RCVD,SPF_HELO_PASS X-Spam-Check-By: sourceware.org Received: from mx1.redhat.com (HELO mx1.redhat.com) (209.132.183.28) by sourceware.org (qpsmtpd/0.43rc1) with ESMTP; Wed, 06 Mar 2013 16:49:13 +0000 Received: from int-mx12.intmail.prod.int.phx2.redhat.com (int-mx12.intmail.prod.int.phx2.redhat.com [10.5.11.25]) by mx1.redhat.com (8.14.4/8.14.4) with ESMTP id r26GnDOQ027460 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA bits=256 verify=OK) for ; Wed, 6 Mar 2013 11:49:13 -0500 Received: from [127.0.0.1] (ovpn01.gateway.prod.ext.ams2.redhat.com [10.39.146.11]) by int-mx12.intmail.prod.int.phx2.redhat.com (8.14.4/8.14.4) with ESMTP id r26GnB6v005496; Wed, 6 Mar 2013 11:49:12 -0500 Message-ID: <51377387.1080103@redhat.com> Date: Wed, 06 Mar 2013 16:49:00 -0000 From: Pedro Alves User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:17.0) Gecko/20130219 Thunderbird/17.0.3 MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Jeff Law CC: overseers@sourceware.org Subject: Re: gdb git mirror (http://sourceware.org/git/gdb.git) wedged? References: <51376CD9.3040909@redhat.com> <51376D92.7030409@redhat.com> In-Reply-To: <51376D92.7030409@redhat.com> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Mailing-List: contact overseers-help@sourceware.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Id: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: , Sender: overseers-owner@sourceware.org X-SW-Source: 2013-q1/txt/msg00073.txt.bz2 On 03/06/2013 04:23 PM, Jeff Law wrote: > On 03/06/2013 09:20 AM, Pedro Alves wrote: >> Maybe it's just a sourceware.org-is-overloaded issue. >> (I have no shell access to be able to check/see that >> myself.) > Load seems to be in the 16-22 range.. I don't know how many cores are there in the system, but I'll assume that's "very overloaded". :-) > We've had a lot of problems with the box being overloaded lately. There was supposed to be new hardware, but I'm not sure about the status of getting those boxes setup. Ack, thanks. -- Pedro Alves