public inbox for overseers@sourceware.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Elena Zannoni <ezannoni@gmail.com>
To: Overseers mailing list <overseers@sourceware.org>
Cc: Joseph Myers <joseph@codesourcery.com>, Jonathan Corbet <corbet@lwn.net>
Subject: Re: The GNU Toolchain Infrastructure Project
Date: Thu, 29 Sep 2022 12:40:45 -0600	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <5bf44616-0ef7-62f5-d8bf-77106cdb4d74@gmail.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <alpine.DEB.2.22.394.2209291702210.527883@digraph.polyomino.org.uk>

On 9/29/22 11:13 AM, Joseph Myers via Overseers wrote:
> On Thu, 29 Sep 2022, Jonathan Corbet via Overseers wrote:
> 
>> Just for the record, it is still my feeling that the LF's infrastructure
>> management has been a good thing for the kernel community.  Whether it
>> would be suitable for the toolchain community is not something I'm in a
>> position to have an opinion on.  If anybody is curious about how
>> interactions with that group work, there is a current discussion on
>> bugzilla that might be interesting:
>>
>>   https://lwn.net/ml/ksummit-discuss/05d149a0-e3de-8b09-ecc0-3ea73e080be3@leemhuis.info/
> 
> Regarding Bugzilla, also see the GTI TAC meeting (24 Aug 2022) recording 
> at 23:37 to 25:44.  It's not clear what good solutions are right now for 
> free software issue tracking, taking into account considerations such as:
> 
> * easy for anyone to submit and comment on bugs;
> 
> * protection against spam bug and comment submission (which is in tension 
> with easy bug submission; we have restricted account creation, with people 
> needing to email overseers to create an account on sourceware Bugzilla at 
> all, or to email gcc-bugzilla-account-request to create an account on GCC 
> Bugzilla from a large number of common email domains in which spammers can 
> easily create accounts);
> 
> * configurability of the fields and values of those fields and other logic 
> used in the bug tracker;
> 
> * ability to get a local copy of the tracker data (this is an area where 
> Bugzilla is weak; you can probably do something with the REST API, but 
> it's not designed to make it easy for someone to keep a local copy of all 
> the data up to date the way git is);
> 
> * being an actively maintained project (that also being a concern for 
> Bugzilla).
> 

BTW, I am just noticing an announcement to revive Bugzilla that came out
in the last month or so:

https://lists.bugzilla.org/pipermail/developers/2022-August/010231.html

elena


  reply	other threads:[~2022-09-29 18:40 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 54+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2022-09-27 19:59 Carlos O'Donell
2022-09-28 14:06 ` Frank Ch. Eigler
2022-09-29  9:51 ` Mark Wielaard
2022-09-29 14:45 ` Jonathan Corbet
2022-09-29 17:13   ` Joseph Myers
2022-09-29 18:40     ` Elena Zannoni [this message]
2022-09-29 18:54     ` Andrew Pinski
2022-10-19  5:47   ` Carlos O'Donell
2022-09-29 21:13 ` Andrew Pinski
2022-09-30 14:35   ` Siddhesh Poyarekar
2022-09-30 15:05     ` Andrew Pinski
2022-09-30 15:51       ` Siddhesh Poyarekar
2022-10-02 21:56         ` Mark Wielaard
2022-09-30 15:22     ` Christopher Faylor
2022-09-30 15:34       ` Siddhesh Poyarekar
2022-10-02 21:38   ` Mark Wielaard
2022-10-02 22:19 ` Mark Wielaard
     [not found] <d9cb6cf9-89f5-87bb-933b-a03240479e71@redhat.com>
     [not found] ` <a9396df3-5699-46ef-0b33-6c7589274654@redhat.com>
2022-10-02 20:47   ` Mark Wielaard
2022-10-04 13:46     ` Siddhesh Poyarekar
2022-10-04 14:01       ` Frank Ch. Eigler
2022-10-04 14:13         ` Siddhesh Poyarekar
2022-10-04 14:19           ` Frank Ch. Eigler
2022-10-04 14:33             ` Siddhesh Poyarekar
2022-10-04 14:41               ` Frank Ch. Eigler
2022-10-04 14:55                 ` Siddhesh Poyarekar
2022-10-04 15:07                   ` Frank Ch. Eigler
2022-10-06 21:42             ` Alexandre Oliva
2022-10-04 17:10       ` Christopher Faylor
2022-10-04 17:17         ` Siddhesh Poyarekar
2022-10-04 18:42           ` Christopher Faylor
2022-10-04 19:05           ` Mark Wielaard
2022-10-04 19:10             ` Siddhesh Poyarekar
2022-10-06 20:02               ` Mark Wielaard
2022-10-06 20:12                 ` Christopher Faylor
2022-10-06 21:37                   ` Siddhesh Poyarekar
2022-10-07 13:39                     ` Mark Wielaard
2022-10-06 21:07                 ` Siddhesh Poyarekar
2022-10-06 21:36                   ` Frank Ch. Eigler
2022-10-06 21:44                     ` Siddhesh Poyarekar
2022-10-06 22:57                       ` Frank Ch. Eigler
2022-10-11 13:02                         ` Siddhesh Poyarekar
2022-10-07  8:57                   ` Mark Wielaard
2022-10-11 13:24                     ` Siddhesh Poyarekar
2022-10-11 14:23                       ` Frank Ch. Eigler
2022-10-11 15:58                     ` Alexandre Oliva
2022-10-11 17:14                       ` David Edelsohn
2022-10-11 18:12                         ` Frank Ch. Eigler
2022-10-12  8:00                         ` Mark Wielaard
2022-10-12 13:18                           ` Florian Weimer
2022-10-12 21:23                             ` Mark Wielaard
2022-10-12 15:15                           ` Jonathan Corbet
2022-10-12 10:55                         ` Alexandre Oliva
     [not found] <b00dc0aa-31a6-a004-a430-099af3d0f6d1@redhat.com>
     [not found] ` <558996ac-e4a0-cf77-48b9-f7d0e13862e8@redhat.com>
2022-10-02 20:54   ` Mark Wielaard
2022-10-03 19:24   ` Carlos O'Donell

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=5bf44616-0ef7-62f5-d8bf-77106cdb4d74@gmail.com \
    --to=ezannoni@gmail.com \
    --cc=corbet@lwn.net \
    --cc=joseph@codesourcery.com \
    --cc=overseers@sourceware.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for read-only IMAP folder(s) and NNTP newsgroup(s).