From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 100105 invoked by alias); 20 Jan 2016 15:35:42 -0000 Mailing-List: contact overseers-help@sourceware.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Id: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: , Sender: overseers-owner@sourceware.org Received: (qmail 100063 invoked by uid 89); 20 Jan 2016 15:35:41 -0000 Authentication-Results: sourceware.org; auth=none X-Virus-Found: No X-Spam-SWARE-Status: No, score=-1.9 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00,RP_MATCHES_RCVD,SPF_PASS autolearn=ham version=3.3.2 spammy=toms, vacation, Hx-languages-length:1617, blamed X-HELO: mailuogwdur.emc.com Received: from mailuogwdur.emc.com (HELO mailuogwdur.emc.com) (128.221.224.79) by sourceware.org (qpsmtpd/0.93/v0.84-503-g423c35a) with (AES256-GCM-SHA384 encrypted) ESMTPS; Wed, 20 Jan 2016 15:35:40 +0000 Received: from maildlpprd52.lss.emc.com (maildlpprd52.lss.emc.com [10.106.48.156]) by mailuogwprd54.lss.emc.com (Sentrion-MTA-4.3.1/Sentrion-MTA-4.3.0) with ESMTP id u0KFZKfu004424 (version=TLSv1.2 cipher=ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 bits=256 verify=NO); Wed, 20 Jan 2016 10:35:21 -0500 X-DKIM: OpenDKIM Filter v2.4.3 mailuogwprd54.lss.emc.com u0KFZKfu004424 X-DKIM: OpenDKIM Filter v2.4.3 mailuogwprd54.lss.emc.com u0KFZKfu004424 Received: from mailusrhubprd53.lss.emc.com (mailusrhubprd53.lss.emc.com [10.106.48.18]) by maildlpprd52.lss.emc.com (RSA Interceptor); Wed, 20 Jan 2016 10:35:06 -0500 Received: from MXHUB210.corp.emc.com (MXHUB210.corp.emc.com [10.253.68.36]) by mailusrhubprd53.lss.emc.com (Sentrion-MTA-4.3.1/Sentrion-MTA-4.3.0) with ESMTP id u0KFZCcT029090 (version=TLSv1.2 cipher=AES128-SHA256 bits=128 verify=FAIL); Wed, 20 Jan 2016 10:35:12 -0500 Received: from MX203CL03.corp.emc.com ([fe80::4dee:b763:b476:8fbc]) by MXHUB210.corp.emc.com ([10.253.68.36]) with mapi id 14.03.0266.001; Wed, 20 Jan 2016 10:35:11 -0500 From: "taylor, david" To: "Frank Ch. Eigler" CC: "tromey@redhat.com" , "overseers@sourceware.org" Subject: RE: access to binutils-gdb.git Date: Wed, 20 Jan 2016 15:35:00 -0000 Message-ID: <63F1AEE13FAE864586D589C671A6E18B0209D5@MX203CL03.corp.emc.com> References: <63F1AEE13FAE864586D589C671A6E18B020952@MX203CL03.corp.emc.com> <20160120150737.GP51204@elastic.org> In-Reply-To: <20160120150737.GP51204@elastic.org> Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable MIME-Version: 1.0 X-Sentrion-Hostname: mailusrhubprd53.lss.emc.com X-RSA-Classifications: public X-SW-Source: 2016-q1/txt/msg00032.txt.bz2 Hello Frank. [BTW, Tom's address bounced for me.] Sadly, I do not know the outgoing address. My desktop has a private addres= s. I don't know what it shows up as externally. And the last machine shown by traceroute before sourceware.org has a 10.x.y.z address with no name. IT blocks git but not http. I first tried git and it failed. Then I tried= http and it worked -- for months. It was working when I left for vacation in December (use it= or lose it vacation policy). Now, January it doesn't work. At first I blamed EMC IT. I can connect to http://sourceware.org just fine. And even http://sourcewa= re.org/git/ . But, when I try to connect to http://sourceware.org/git/binutils-gdb.git, I= have problems. Does the blacklist make the distinction? Does the git port not have a blac= klist? I have asked IT about the possibility of using the git port instead of the = http port. No answer as yet. -----Original Message----- From: Frank Ch. Eigler [mailto:fche@elastic.org]=20 Sent: Wednesday, January 20, 2016 10:08 AM To: taylor, david Cc: tromey@redhat.com; overseers@sourceware.org Subject: Re: access to binutils-gdb.git Hi, David - > [...] For months I updated a local clone of the binutils-gdb=20 > repository using the http protocol. And it worked. Recently it=20 > stopped working. [...] Forbidden You don't have permission to access=20 > /git/binutils-gdb.git/ on this server. [...] I guess you don't have access to git: or ssh: instead? We blacklist some IP address ranges due to a history of abuse. Do you have= any idea what the outgoing address of your connections might be? - FChE