From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Jeffrey A Law To: Tom Tromey Cc: Benjamin Kosnik , overseers@sourceware.cygnus.com, mark@codesourcery.com Subject: Re: libstdc++-v3 module moved into egcs Date: Sat, 30 Dec 2000 06:08:00 -0000 Message-id: <6455.956593342@upchuck> References: <200004241710.KAA11992@ferrule.cygnus.com> X-SW-Source: 2000/msg00397.html In message < 200004241710.KAA11992@ferrule.cygnus.com >you write: > >> 3) libstdc++-cvs@sourceware.cygnus.com needs to reflect checkins in > >> the new repository, not the old one. > > Jeff> Actually I think checkin messages should go to gcc-cvs, just > Jeff> like everything else in the gcc repository. I don't see the > Jeff> benefit in separating out the cvs checkin messages for just > Jeff> libstdc++. > > Speaking as someone whose library might someday be integrated into the > gcc tree: I sure see the benefit. I don't want to wade through 1000 > gcc commits just to see the 3 libgcj commits I'm interested in. > > Messages can be CC'd to the gcc list if you want to see them that way > for some reason. I don't feel strongly about it, so if y'all want it, I'm not going to complain loudly :-) jeff From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Jeffrey A Law To: Tom Tromey Cc: Benjamin Kosnik , overseers@sourceware.cygnus.com, mark@codesourcery.com Subject: Re: libstdc++-v3 module moved into egcs Date: Mon, 24 Apr 2000 10:31:00 -0000 Message-ID: <6455.956593342@upchuck> References: <200004241710.KAA11992@ferrule.cygnus.com> X-SW-Source: 2000-q2/msg00090.html Message-ID: <20000424103100.bFcb9bAp7AKyGfzMkQVjhP5ARyVk-v56565NvcehGGs@z> In message < 200004241710.KAA11992@ferrule.cygnus.com >you write: > >> 3) libstdc++-cvs@sourceware.cygnus.com needs to reflect checkins in > >> the new repository, not the old one. > > Jeff> Actually I think checkin messages should go to gcc-cvs, just > Jeff> like everything else in the gcc repository. I don't see the > Jeff> benefit in separating out the cvs checkin messages for just > Jeff> libstdc++. > > Speaking as someone whose library might someday be integrated into the > gcc tree: I sure see the benefit. I don't want to wade through 1000 > gcc commits just to see the 3 libgcj commits I'm interested in. > > Messages can be CC'd to the gcc list if you want to see them that way > for some reason. I don't feel strongly about it, so if y'all want it, I'm not going to complain loudly :-) jeff