From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from dragonfly.ash.relay.mailchannels.net (dragonfly.ash.relay.mailchannels.net [23.83.222.51]) by sourceware.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id EDEDF3858C83; Tue, 18 Oct 2022 15:17:23 +0000 (GMT) DMARC-Filter: OpenDMARC Filter v1.4.1 sourceware.org EDEDF3858C83 Authentication-Results: sourceware.org; dmarc=none (p=none dis=none) header.from=gotplt.org Authentication-Results: sourceware.org; spf=pass smtp.mailfrom=gotplt.org X-Sender-Id: dreamhost|x-authsender|siddhesh@gotplt.org Received: from relay.mailchannels.net (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by relay.mailchannels.net (Postfix) with ESMTP id 5D3C3542269; Tue, 18 Oct 2022 15:17:18 +0000 (UTC) Received: from pdx1-sub0-mail-a305 (unknown [127.0.0.6]) (Authenticated sender: dreamhost) by relay.mailchannels.net (Postfix) with ESMTPA id A9A7E541F70; Tue, 18 Oct 2022 15:17:17 +0000 (UTC) ARC-Seal: i=1; s=arc-2022; d=mailchannels.net; t=1666106237; a=rsa-sha256; cv=none; b=hvlW/mBjTf/pgp6Yh7k7G6HdW+OVm7psacDCru5vupDEZDOJCtx9OuYQBkA3osR7ByxjJN SY1unHjN2Lkk24zSysx0EbO9x+jlsYAHq8Sp2RRDxKa+a4aHVKrHBiFp8SZL45Zk3eXet1 xVYxDCnVUStIfmxdzmNHxxIN2rGDhu5qUiN1DEx8/UlznzIWBARftzqFWv8HpRcqQeyHWx 7p268et9zmcYsgBi5abYYxGBfytx9ncUGI62BIoCxVquuPt4LCS6m/Peb2PZBmlBU5RqXz RESo1t8UiQuet+FMxEWO7zJ/lnUxBMpPmoDobJt+HqaDlR+lV5i9XnJeXddHeA== ARC-Message-Signature: i=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=mailchannels.net; s=arc-2022; t=1666106237; h=from:from:reply-to:subject:subject:date:date:message-id:message-id: to:to:cc:cc:mime-version:mime-version:content-type:content-type: content-transfer-encoding:content-transfer-encoding: in-reply-to:in-reply-to:references:references:dkim-signature; bh=hqEJyVIht0jN0ppulVKw0/yarxZAYN6+6XVgAOoKUGY=; b=Jr8PPceu9M38JhJTktstWP5v77tChpegnshxe+9AlGuqWPZ5Dx7g9Rz+3I/8aZfoo9XOAd U9dGCosl8UzlksvJM8djX456rgr2YJ9BPbtejodezdjyAp3fUck+PltoVoq4qw++emGDLr 7Gev4HZYW318q8AtrZaKd6UOQYw4/n+yklIIp7jd0Wbuw7PBRMmTGOGJIzCdtUUGiIvuDJ 9sqdGj+ZqVMC+56IasVqdhFECYC9gKzSOXD0nOGwhTKPMkcKPA0AHcvYxzCwMPzwLzhatF dS6H9aYtzumJWdw3Ukr/dFNwal6vIdpU41w0p9kmHWW2jMqSpPF4euKKldgUDA== ARC-Authentication-Results: i=1; rspamd-7fb88f4dd5-rw4jz; auth=pass smtp.auth=dreamhost smtp.mailfrom=siddhesh@gotplt.org X-Sender-Id: dreamhost|x-authsender|siddhesh@gotplt.org X-MC-Relay: Neutral X-MailChannels-SenderId: dreamhost|x-authsender|siddhesh@gotplt.org X-MailChannels-Auth-Id: dreamhost X-Bottle-Shoe: 7e6410624e440d41_1666106238036_3346107340 X-MC-Loop-Signature: 1666106238036:712162936 X-MC-Ingress-Time: 1666106238035 Received: from pdx1-sub0-mail-a305 (pop.dreamhost.com [64.90.62.162]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384) by 100.122.213.136 (trex/6.7.1); Tue, 18 Oct 2022 15:17:18 +0000 Received: from [192.168.0.182] (bras-vprn-toroon4834w-lp130-05-174-93-41-34.dsl.bell.ca [174.93.41.34]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_128_GCM_SHA256 (128/128 bits) key-exchange X25519 server-signature RSA-PSS (4096 bits) server-digest SHA256) (No client certificate requested) (Authenticated sender: siddhesh@gotplt.org) by pdx1-sub0-mail-a305 (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 4MsHXX5Mf9z3H; Tue, 18 Oct 2022 08:17:16 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gotplt.org; s=dreamhost; t=1666106237; bh=hqEJyVIht0jN0ppulVKw0/yarxZAYN6+6XVgAOoKUGY=; h=Date:Subject:To:Cc:From:Content-Type:Content-Transfer-Encoding; b=ZTCCswJ8+E3rx5EmJG0GZ8XIrKPGUL4vgqFN6u/jDJoC83yi65MO/64qSzfzm775K UnwLWxzhNFDDQum7fusKt0JXyQP6VC3dNSpSiejH8TlYqLKbGTKwpje1cCNyZOmeMe a5DqORsDEiOJeg1zRolDmkHriYLO+t8n7Ms2jQ00RLbUw/aNjiJghiB2wnCxFGZNel X3RBebHH+AYugI9MNcm4GFVyrp8b1Wy9efeeK3OTAwDTsFNrtEkGZjQu0gApLWYJ09 8e5PB3wTGjL/J8WNyBKnTnQohxMINma0dZTK00uUBKoI9yJTErFJFrIVh5rDFhxFmQ UHWaYr37stvdw== Message-ID: <7abeb179-2c05-eee9-bd68-3b5f8a11bd32@gotplt.org> Date: Tue, 18 Oct 2022 11:17:15 -0400 MIME-Version: 1.0 User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:91.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/91.12.0 Subject: Re: Toolchain Infrastructure project statement of support Content-Language: en-US To: Mark Wielaard Cc: Overseers mailing list , gdb@sourceware.org, libc-alpha@sourceware.org, binutils@sourceware.org, gcc@gcc.gnu.org References: <2513b668-9ebd-9e78-7263-dc24f4a9558a@redhat.com> <20221013182529.sm76fysq37sv754x@cgf.cx> <9c0a9111-07b1-3617-c5c8-4b12e616f985@gotplt.org> From: Siddhesh Poyarekar In-Reply-To: Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Spam-Status: No, score=-3029.6 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00,DKIM_SIGNED,DKIM_VALID,DKIM_VALID_AU,DKIM_VALID_EF,LOTS_OF_MONEY,NICE_REPLY_A,RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE,RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_H2,SPF_HELO_NONE,SPF_PASS,TXREP autolearn=no autolearn_force=no version=3.4.6 X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.6 (2021-04-09) on server2.sourceware.org List-Id: On 2022-10-18 05:50, Mark Wielaard wrote: > Hi Siddhesh, > > On Mon, Oct 17, 2022 at 12:11:53PM -0400, Siddhesh Poyarekar wrote: >> There seems to be little to discuss from the GNU toolchain perspective IMO; > > Yes, it is clear you don't want any discussion or answer any questions > about the proposals, That is not true, Mark. Your objections and questions have been answered at every stage, privately as well as publicly. What *is* clear is that we have been talking past each other because despite our common high level intentions, we appear to have little common ground for our goals. You want to retain the current sourceware infrastructure and try and see what we can do within that framework and I want us to migrate services to infrastructure with better funding (that's not just limited to services), dedicated ops management and an actually scalable future. > how funds can be used, Let me turn that around: how *would* you like funds to be used beyond what is currently proposed in the LF IT proposal? > what the budget is, Around $400,000. > what > the requirements are, Your lack of clarity about requirements IMO have more to do with you wanting to fulfill those requirements within sourceware and not with their existence. I and others have repeated them here and the overseers have either questioned their validity or noted them in bugzilla as possible things to explore in the current sourceware context. With sourceware migration to LF IT off the table, there's little incentive for me personally to explore them. > how the governance structure works, I think you know how it works, maybe you meant to say that you don't like it? The governance structure and their workings have been described in the GTI introduction. There are two key bodies that govern the project: the Technical Advisory Council (comprised of project community members) manages the technical details of the infrastructure and the governing board (comprised of representatives from funding companies) manages the funding for those technical details. The current TAC comprises of people from the initial community stakeholders who were contacted and subsequently accepted the invitation to be part of TAC. You, along with other overseers, were invited too but most of you declined. > what > alternatives we have, etc. For projects the alternatives they have are: 1. Migrate to LF IT infrastructure 2. Have a presence on sourceware as well as LF IT, contingent to Red Hat's decision on the hardware infrastructure 3. Stay fully on sourceware For sourceware as infrastructure the alternatives are: 1. Migrate to LF IT infrastructure 2. Stay as it currently is For sourceware overseers, the choices are contingent on what projects decide and what Red Hat decides w.r.t. sourceware. All of the above has been clear all along. Maybe the problem here is that you're not happy with the alternatives? > But personally I think it is healthy to have real discussions, doing > resource analysis, creating public roadmaps, collecting infrastructure > enahancement requests, discuss how to organize, argue about the needed > budget and how to use funding most efficiently, etc. To make sure that > sourceware keeps being a healthy and viable free software > infrastructure project for the next 24 years, hopefully including the > various GNU toolchain projects. You want to talk about sourceware without including the LF IT proposal whereas I'd love to talk about sourceware as an LF IT maintained infrastructure. There's a real disconnect that precludes any real discussions. Sid