Re: failure notice

Re: failure notice

[ASSI]

Hello,

it looks like the cygwin.com mailing lists have fallen out of the sky on 
sourceware and mail to these addresses is not accepted anymore.  Can this 
please be fixed?

On Saturday 07 February 2015, 21:18:05, MAILER-DAEMON@sourceware.org wrote:
> Hi. This is the qmail-send program at sourceware.org.
> I'm afraid I wasn't able to deliver your message to the following
> addresses. This is a permanent error; I've given up. Sorry it didn't work
> out.
> 
> <cygwin-apps-cvs@sourceware.org>:
> Sorry, no mailbox here by that name. (#5.1.1)
> 
> --- Below this line is a copy of the message.
> 
> Return-Path: <gratz@sourceware.org>
> Received: (qmail 27737 invoked by uid 10076); 7 Feb 2015 21:18:05 -0000
> Message-ID: <20150207211805.27734.qmail@sourceware.org>
> From: gratz@sourceware.org
> Date: Sat, 07 Feb 2015 21:18:05 +0000
> To: cygwin-apps-cvs@sourceware.org
> Subject: setup ChangeLog install.cc
> User-Agent: Heirloom mailx 12.4 7/29/08
> MIME-Version: 1.0
> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
> Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
> 
> CVSROOT:	/cvs/cygwin-apps
> Module name:	setup
> Changes by:	gratz@sourceware.org	2015-02-07 21:18:05
> 
> Modified files:
> 	.              : ChangeLog install.cc
> 
> Log message:
> 	* install.cc (preremoveOne): Allow dash scripts and ".cmd" as an
> 	additional extension for Windows batch files.
> 
> Patches:
> http://sourceware.org/cgi-bin/cvsweb.cgi/setup/ChangeLog.diff?cvsroot=cygw
> in-apps&r1=2.868&r2=2.869
> http://sourceware.org/cgi-bin/cvsweb.cgi/setup/install.cc.diff?cvsroot=cy
> gwin-apps&r1=2.116&r2=2.117


Achim.
-- 
+<[Q+ Matrix-12 WAVE#46+305 Neuron microQkb Andromeda XTk Blofeld]>+

SD adaptation for Waldorf rackAttack V1.04R1:
http://Synth.Stromeko.net/Downloads.html#WaldorfSDada

Cygwin mailing lists out of order (was Re: failure notice)

[Corinna Vinschen]

[-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain, Size: 470 bytes --]

Hi overseers,

On Feb  8 09:22, ASSI wrote:
> Hello,
> 
> it looks like the cygwin.com mailing lists have fallen out of the sky on 
> sourceware and mail to these addresses is not accepted anymore.

Same here.  For some reason I don't even get a bounce message.

No new mail appeared on the Cygwin list archives since Friday.

> Can this 
> please be fixed?

That would be nice.


Thanks,
Corinna

-- 
Corinna Vinschen
Cygwin Maintainer
Red Hat

[-- Attachment #2: Type: application/pgp-signature, Size: 819 bytes --]

Re: Cygwin mailing lists out of order (was Re: failure notice)

[Frank Ch. Eigler]

Hi -

> > it looks like the cygwin.com mailing lists have fallen out of the sky on 
> > sourceware and mail to these addresses is not accepted anymore.

I don't understand the mechanics of it, but it seems as though the
change of the cygwin user to have a proper shell may have tricked
qmail into ignoring the cygwin-* aliases in /qmail/alias.  I restored
that capability by tweaking /qmail/users/assign and rerunning
qmail-newu to update /qmail/users/cdb.  Now the cygwin* mailing lists
are handled by the /qmail/alias directory regardless of the user.
(While at it, fixed the gdbadmin/gccadmin mailing list uid to 7790.)


- FChE

Re: failure notice

[Steven Bosscher]

Hello overseers,

I got this bounce message because I attached two PNG images to an
e-mail to gcc-patches:

On Wed, Sep 12, 2012 at 7:00 PM,  <xxx> wrote:
> Hi. This is the qmail-send program at sourceware.org.
> I'm afraid I wasn't able to deliver your message to the following addresses.
> This is a permanent error; I've given up. Sorry it didn't work out.
>
> <gcc-patches at gcc dot gnu dot org>:
> ezmlm-reject: fatal: Sorry, a message part has an unacceptable MIME Content-Type: image/png (#5.2.3)


Why are PNG attachments not allowed?

Ciao!
Steven

Fw: failure notice

[David S. Miller]

[-- Attachment #1: Type: Text/Plain, Size: 91 bytes --]


Can someone fix my account to point davem@gcc.gnu.org
to davem@redhat.com?

Thanks a lot!

[-- Attachment #2: Type: Message/Rfc822, Size: 2959 bytes --]

From: MAILER-DAEMON@sources.redhat.com
To: davem@redhat.com
Subject: failure notice
Date: 4 Apr 2002 01:43:13 -0000
Message-ID: <200204040140.g341eRY27634@mx1.redhat.com>

Hi. This is the qmail-send program at sources.redhat.com.
I'm afraid I wasn't able to deliver your message to the following addresses.
This is a permanent error; I've given up. Sorry it didn't work out.

<davem@gcc.gnu.org>:
No forwarding information (#5.2.1)

--- Below this line is a copy of the message.

Return-Path: <davem@redhat.com>
Received: (qmail 27338 invoked from network); 4 Apr 2002 01:43:12 -0000
Received: from unknown (HELO pizda.ninka.net) (216.101.162.242)
  by sources.redhat.com with SMTP; 4 Apr 2002 01:43:12 -0000
Received: from localhost (IDENT:davem@localhost.localdomain [127.0.0.1])
	by pizda.ninka.net (8.9.3/8.9.3) with ESMTP id RAA23051;
	Wed, 3 Apr 2002 17:37:12 -0800
Date: Wed, 03 Apr 2002 17:37:11 -0800 (PST)
Message-Id: <20020403.173711.69318124.davem@redhat.com>
To: lucier@math.purdue.edu
Cc: davem@gcc.gnu.org, gcc-patches@gcc.gnu.org
Subject: Re: gcc/gcc config.gcc config/sparc/linux.h config ...
From: "David S. Miller" <davem@redhat.com>
In-Reply-To: <200204040139.g341d1E27324@banach.math.purdue.edu>
References: <200204040139.g341d1E27324@banach.math.purdue.edu>
X-Mailer: Mew version 2.1 on Emacs 21.1 / Mule 5.0 (SAKAKI)
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: Text/Plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit

   From: Brad Lucier <lucier@math.purdue.edu>
   Date: Wed, 3 Apr 2002 20:39:01 -0500 (EST)

   Can we have a posting to gcc-patches that describes this patch?
   
Please see optimization/4487 in GNATS.  Or:

http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-bugs/2002-04/msg00280.html

Re: Fw: failure notice

[law]

In message <20020403.173846.12556963.davem@redhat.com>, "David S. Miller" write
s:
 > ----Next_Part(Wed_Apr__3_17:38:46_2002_314)--
 > Content-Type: Text/Plain; charset=us-ascii
 > Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
 > 
 > 
 > Can someone fix my account to point davem@gcc.gnu.org
 > to davem@redhat.com?

Looks like someone took care of this a few days ago.  Can you confirm it
works?
jeff

Re: failure notice

[David S. Miller]

   From: law@redhat.com
   Date: Sun, 07 Apr 2002 10:49:50 -0600
   
   Looks like someone took care of this a few days ago.  Can you
   confirm it works?

As Christoph stated, yes it was taken care of.  And yes I can confirm
that it works :-)

Re: failure notice

[Chris Faylor]

Well, *now* it certainly works...

cgf

On Fri, Nov 03, 2000 at 09:30:43PM -0000, MAILER-DAEMON@sourceware.cygnus.com wrote:
>Hi. This is the qmail-send program at sourceware.cygnus.com.
>I'm afraid I wasn't able to deliver your message to the following addresses.
>This is a permanent error; I've given up. Sorry it didn't work out.
>
><overseers@gcc.gnu.org>:
>/  Mail note rejected:  List address must be in To: or Cc: headers.
>
>
>--- Below this line is a copy of the message.
>
>Return-Path: <cgf@redhat.com>
>Received: (qmail 28970 invoked from network); 3 Nov 2000 21:30:41 -0000
>Received: from runyon.cygnus.com (HELO cygnus.com) (205.180.230.5)
>  by sourceware.cygnus.com with SMTP; 3 Nov 2000 21:30:41 -0000
>Received: from rtl.cygnus.com (loony.cygnus.com [205.180.230.181])
>	by runyon.cygnus.com (8.8.7-cygnus/8.8.7) with ESMTP id NAA25910
>	for <overseers@gcc.gnu.org>; Fri, 3 Nov 2000 13:30:41 -0800 (PST)
>Received: (from cgf@localhost)
>	by rtl.cygnus.com (8.9.3/8.8.7) id QAA19044
>	for overseers@gcc.gnu.org; Fri, 3 Nov 2000 16:30:29 -0500
>Date: Fri, 3 Nov 2000 16:30:29 -0500
>From: Christopher Faylor <cgf@redhat.com>
>To: overseers@gcc.gnu.org
>Subject: Re: GNATS write access
>Message-ID: <20001103163029.P17861@redhat.com>
>Reply-To: overseers@sources.redhat.com
>Mail-Followup-To: overseers@gcc.gnu.org
>References: < 200011031927.LAA18439@racerx.synopsys.com > < Pine.BSF.4.30.0011032103330.38006-100000@taygeta.dbai.tuwien.ac.at >
>Mime-Version: 1.0
>Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
>Content-Disposition: inline
>User-Agent: Mutt/1.3.6i
>In-Reply-To: < Pine.BSF.4.30.0011032103330.38006-100000@taygeta.dbai.tuwien.ac.at >; from pfeifer@dbai.tuwien.ac.at on Fri, Nov 03, 2000 at 09:08:34PM +0100
>
>On Fri, Nov 03, 2000 at 09:08:34PM +0100, Gerald Pfeifer wrote:
>>On Fri, 3 Nov 2000, Joe Buck wrote:
>>> I need to have GNATS write access.  Mark Mitchell pointed me to
>>> "overseers".  Can someone set this up?
>>
>>Folks, I'll take care of it.
>>
>>A general question: Do new GCC contributors now automatically get a
>>GNATS account set up from the beginning?
>>
>>If so, we don't need to document the procedure how to obtain one on
>>the web, else we should (and I'm going to do so).
>>
>>In this case, can I mention the overseers address there? If so, can
>>we have an alias overseers@gcc.gnu.org, please? (Trust me, this will
>>save a couple of us some undesirable discussions later on... :-/)
>
>Won't this just work now?
>
>I guess we'll find out.  This email is sent to "overseers@gcc.gnu.org".
>
>cgf

Re: failure notice

[Chris Faylor]

Well, *now* it certainly works...

cgf

On Fri, Nov 03, 2000 at 09:30:43PM -0000, MAILER-DAEMON@sourceware.cygnus.com wrote:
>Hi. This is the qmail-send program at sourceware.cygnus.com.
>I'm afraid I wasn't able to deliver your message to the following addresses.
>This is a permanent error; I've given up. Sorry it didn't work out.
>
><overseers@gcc.gnu.org>:
>/  Mail note rejected:  List address must be in To: or Cc: headers.
>
>
>--- Below this line is a copy of the message.
>
>Return-Path: <cgf@redhat.com>
>Received: (qmail 28970 invoked from network); 3 Nov 2000 21:30:41 -0000
>Received: from runyon.cygnus.com (HELO cygnus.com) (205.180.230.5)
>  by sourceware.cygnus.com with SMTP; 3 Nov 2000 21:30:41 -0000
>Received: from rtl.cygnus.com (loony.cygnus.com [205.180.230.181])
>	by runyon.cygnus.com (8.8.7-cygnus/8.8.7) with ESMTP id NAA25910
>	for <overseers@gcc.gnu.org>; Fri, 3 Nov 2000 13:30:41 -0800 (PST)
>Received: (from cgf@localhost)
>	by rtl.cygnus.com (8.9.3/8.8.7) id QAA19044
>	for overseers@gcc.gnu.org; Fri, 3 Nov 2000 16:30:29 -0500
>Date: Fri, 3 Nov 2000 16:30:29 -0500
>From: Christopher Faylor <cgf@redhat.com>
>To: overseers@gcc.gnu.org
>Subject: Re: GNATS write access
>Message-ID: <20001103163029.P17861@redhat.com>
>Reply-To: overseers@sources.redhat.com
>Mail-Followup-To: overseers@gcc.gnu.org
>References: < 200011031927.LAA18439@racerx.synopsys.com > < Pine.BSF.4.30.0011032103330.38006-100000@taygeta.dbai.tuwien.ac.at >
>Mime-Version: 1.0
>Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
>Content-Disposition: inline
>User-Agent: Mutt/1.3.6i
>In-Reply-To: < Pine.BSF.4.30.0011032103330.38006-100000@taygeta.dbai.tuwien.ac.at >; from pfeifer@dbai.tuwien.ac.at on Fri, Nov 03, 2000 at 09:08:34PM +0100
>
>On Fri, Nov 03, 2000 at 09:08:34PM +0100, Gerald Pfeifer wrote:
>>On Fri, 3 Nov 2000, Joe Buck wrote:
>>> I need to have GNATS write access.  Mark Mitchell pointed me to
>>> "overseers".  Can someone set this up?
>>
>>Folks, I'll take care of it.
>>
>>A general question: Do new GCC contributors now automatically get a
>>GNATS account set up from the beginning?
>>
>>If so, we don't need to document the procedure how to obtain one on
>>the web, else we should (and I'm going to do so).
>>
>>In this case, can I mention the overseers address there? If so, can
>>we have an alias overseers@gcc.gnu.org, please? (Trust me, this will
>>save a couple of us some undesirable discussions later on... :-/)
>
>Won't this just work now?
>
>I guess we'll find out.  This email is sent to "overseers@gcc.gnu.org".
>
>cgf