From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 30804 invoked by alias); 6 Apr 2004 00:29:24 -0000 Mailing-List: contact overseers-help@sources.redhat.com; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: , Sender: overseers-owner@sources.redhat.com Received: (qmail 30786 invoked from network); 6 Apr 2004 00:29:20 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO mail.codesourcery.com) (65.74.133.6) by sources.redhat.com with SMTP; 6 Apr 2004 00:29:20 -0000 Received: (qmail 11486 invoked from network); 6 Apr 2004 00:29:19 -0000 Received: from localhost (HELO taltos.codesourcery.com) (zack@127.0.0.1) by mail.codesourcery.com with SMTP; 6 Apr 2004 00:29:19 -0000 Received: by taltos.codesourcery.com (sSMTP sendmail emulation); Mon, 5 Apr 2004 17:28:04 -0700 To: Matthew Galgoci Cc: Christopher Faylor , David Edelsohn , Subject: Re: htdig and sources.redhat.com loadavg References: From: Zack Weinberg Date: Tue, 06 Apr 2004 00:29:00 -0000 In-Reply-To: (Matthew Galgoci's message of "Mon, 5 Apr 2004 20:06:19 -0400 (EDT)") Message-ID: <874qryar1n.fsf@codesourcery.com> User-Agent: Gnus/5.1002 (Gnus v5.10.2) Emacs/21.3 (gnu/linux) MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii X-SW-Source: 2004-q2/txt/msg00056.txt.bz2 Matthew Galgoci writes: > On Mon, 5 Apr 2004, Zack Weinberg wrote: > >> Matthew Galgoci writes: >> >> > Ideally the searching should be offloaded to another machine that is >> > dedicated to the purpose of indexing and running the search >> > database. I'd be willing to set up mnogosearch to replace htdig, but >> > to do so on sources I think would be a bad idea. >> >> Interesting suggestion. Is Red Hat willing to donate the hardware? >> > > Getting hardware at a software company is a pain. I was wondering if > maybe we could hit up maybe ibm or hp and get one of those swanky > opteron 1u servers. Maybe, but I'm not the person to be asking... zw