From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Return-Path: <fw@deneb.enyo.de>
Received: from albireo.enyo.de (albireo.enyo.de [37.24.231.21])
 by sourceware.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 2037E38930E8;
 Wed, 29 Apr 2020 10:13:46 +0000 (GMT)
DMARC-Filter: OpenDMARC Filter v1.3.2 sourceware.org 2037E38930E8
Received: from [172.17.203.2] (helo=deneb.enyo.de)
 by albireo.enyo.de with esmtps (TLS1.3:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256)
 id 1jTjiq-0000UD-Rk; Wed, 29 Apr 2020 10:13:44 +0000
Received: from fw by deneb.enyo.de with local (Exim 4.92)
 (envelope-from <fw@deneb.enyo.de>)
 id 1jTjiq-0006hs-Ow; Wed, 29 Apr 2020 12:13:44 +0200
From: Florian Weimer <fw@deneb.enyo.de>
To: "Frank Ch. Eigler" <fche@redhat.com>
Cc: Overseers mailing list <overseers@sourceware.org>,
 libc-alpha@sourceware.org
Subject: Re: Early blind copy for libc-alpha
References: <87y2qeejd2.fsf@mid.deneb.enyo.de>
 <20200429100414.GD21677@redhat.com>
Date: Wed, 29 Apr 2020 12:13:44 +0200
In-Reply-To: <20200429100414.GD21677@redhat.com> (Frank Ch. Eigler's message
 of "Wed, 29 Apr 2020 06:04:14 -0400")
Message-ID: <877dxyeh0n.fsf@mid.deneb.enyo.de>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-8.9 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00, KAM_DMARC_STATUS,
 SPF_HELO_NONE, SPF_PASS, TXREP autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no version=3.4.2
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.2 (2018-09-13) on
 server2.sourceware.org
X-BeenThere: overseers@sourceware.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29
Precedence: list
List-Id: Overseers mailing list <overseers.sourceware.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <http://sourceware.org/mailman/options/overseers>,
 <mailto:overseers-request@sourceware.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://sourceware.org/pipermail/overseers/>
List-Post: <mailto:overseers@sourceware.org>
List-Help: <mailto:overseers-request@sourceware.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <http://sourceware.org/mailman/listinfo/overseers>,
 <mailto:overseers-request@sourceware.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 29 Apr 2020 10:13:53 -0000

* Frank Ch. Eigler:

>> Would it be possible to get an early copy of messages sent to
>> <libc-alpha@sourceware.org> before they go into Mailman?
>
> The closest thing I can think of is adding a new alias, like
> libc-alpha-raw, which expands to libc-alpha and you?

Thanks.  No, that's not really useful, sorry.

>> It will help those of us who apply patches on other people's behalf,
>> without having to undo the Mailman mangling first.
>
> Please also see alternatives outlined in:
> https://sourceware.org/pipermail/overseers/2020q1/016783.html

I guess moving glibc development to a platform that does not have this
problem is something we have to consider at this point.  I do not
think adding even more requirements for contributors is the
appropriate way forward.