From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 3312 invoked by alias); 5 Apr 2004 23:36:01 -0000 Mailing-List: contact overseers-help@sources.redhat.com; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: , Sender: overseers-owner@sources.redhat.com Received: (qmail 3267 invoked from network); 5 Apr 2004 23:35:55 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO mail.codesourcery.com) (65.74.133.6) by sources.redhat.com with SMTP; 5 Apr 2004 23:35:55 -0000 Received: (qmail 7011 invoked from network); 5 Apr 2004 23:35:54 -0000 Received: from localhost (HELO taltos.codesourcery.com) (zack@127.0.0.1) by mail.codesourcery.com with SMTP; 5 Apr 2004 23:35:54 -0000 Received: by taltos.codesourcery.com (sSMTP sendmail emulation); Mon, 5 Apr 2004 16:34:40 -0700 To: Matthew Galgoci Cc: Christopher Faylor , David Edelsohn , Subject: Re: htdig and sources.redhat.com loadavg References: From: Zack Weinberg Date: Mon, 05 Apr 2004 23:36:00 -0000 In-Reply-To: (Matthew Galgoci's message of "Mon, 5 Apr 2004 17:21:12 -0400 (EDT)") Message-ID: <87d66matin.fsf@codesourcery.com> User-Agent: Gnus/5.1002 (Gnus v5.10.2) Emacs/21.3 (gnu/linux) MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii X-SW-Source: 2004-q2/txt/msg00052.txt.bz2 Matthew Galgoci writes: > Ideally the searching should be offloaded to another machine that is > dedicated to the purpose of indexing and running the search > database. I'd be willing to set up mnogosearch to replace htdig, but > to do so on sources I think would be a bad idea. Interesting suggestion. Is Red Hat willing to donate the hardware? zw