Re: binutils-cvs and binutils-bugs lists

[Sam James <sam@gentoo.org>]

Mark Wielaard <mark@klomp.org> writes:

> Hi Sam,
>
> On Fri, Mar 22, 2024 at 08:28:46AM +0000, Sam James via Overseers wrote:
>> For a while now, I've been wishing a binutils-cvs (or binutils-commits,
>> whatever) list existed.
>> 
>> It turns out one did exist [0] but it's had no non-spam messages since
>> 2022-08-15. Was that intentional or did a hook just break at some point
>> so it stopped getting notifications?
>
> The pipermail archive still is getting updates:
> https://sourceware.org/pipermail/binutils-cvs/
>
> I think the issue is that mail is sent to bfd-cvs@sourceware.org.
> That addressis rejected by inbox.sourceware.org (but seems to have a
> special exception in mailman). So after the original import no new
> messages (except some spam) have been added.
>
> I filed https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=31529
> We should import the rest and add an alias (and/or change the mail
> sending setup).

Ah, thanks! That must have been there I'd seen it in the past, but since
moved to public-inbox for all my viewing.

>
>> Also, while we're at it, does anyone object to a binutils-bugs list,
>> like gdb-prs, and gcc-bugs?
>
> binutils uses https://lists.gnu.org/archive/html/bug-binutils/

Could that possibly be added to inbox.s.o?

>
>> [0] https://inbox.sourceware.org/binutils-cvs/ [1]

thanks,
sam