From: Mark Galassi <rosalia@lanl.gov>
To: overseers@sourceware.cygnus.com
Subject: important people (!) unable to use sourceware
Date: Sat, 30 Dec 2000 06:08:00 -0000 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <87vh2vafvt.fsf@portacipria.lanl.gov> (raw)
Amigos, I'd like to propose that we drop the current RBL scheme for
blacklisting.
A few things have me thinking about it:
1. I'm in Italy for a couple of months and it turns out that TIN (the
Italian telecom's ISP, which is by far the biggest here) is
blacklisted. This is kind of selfish and whine-ey, so let me go
on:
2. Norm Walsh, the most important person in the DocBook world, is on
our docbook-tools list. He's one of the most agreeable people
you'll ever meet, and he just wrote me this:
> I'm certainly interested. I have a real problem with this
> mailing list though. It turns out that the ISP I use when I
> travel, and I travel too much ;-), has been blacklisted by
> whatever service this mailing list uses to avoid spammers. So I
> can't post here when I'm on the road.
> I'm so pissed about this that I'm "this close" to unsubscribing.
Since I'm going through the same stuff, I fully agree with him, and I
feel embarassed offering the sourceware services to the person I
really want to participate in my list. And to think I was so honored
when he joined... Without him my "next generation DocBook thrust"
will be severely diminished.
3. It turns out that the mechanism for white-listing a person
(i.e. allowing him through even if his ISP is black-listed) does
not do the job for me or for Norman or for anyone who uses an ISP
when traveling: Jason says you can't blank out a whole range of IP
address -- you can only blank them out one at a time. Almost all
ISPs give you a dynamic IP address....
4. When traveling I usually work offline, and I suspect others do too.
I wrote a dozen or more messages on three sourceware lists last
night, connected to send them off, and found that they had *all*
bounced. This makes the problem even worse in the case where it
manifests itself more easily.
This makes me think that our criteria are too harsh, too much of a
blanket statement, and that they get in the way of work instead of
promoting it.
Is there a better way? Who's a scholar on spam blacklisting?
I would propose that a "requirement" on the system be that people be
able to travel and hook up their laptops to major ISPs and still use
our system. Unfortunately outside the US it is not really an option
to telnet back home to send email: things are too slow and people have
to work offline.
WARNING: multiple messages have this Message-ID
From: Mark Galassi <rosalia@lanl.gov>
To: overseers@sourceware.cygnus.com
Subject: important people (!) unable to use sourceware
Date: Thu, 09 Mar 2000 15:27:00 -0000 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <87vh2vafvt.fsf@portacipria.lanl.gov> (raw)
Message-ID: <20000309152700.5-EFRnPCIywjNkgjJEfa9YGWOf49Y6oHXbtZTw577W8@z> (raw)
Amigos, I'd like to propose that we drop the current RBL scheme for
blacklisting.
A few things have me thinking about it:
1. I'm in Italy for a couple of months and it turns out that TIN (the
Italian telecom's ISP, which is by far the biggest here) is
blacklisted. This is kind of selfish and whine-ey, so let me go
on:
2. Norm Walsh, the most important person in the DocBook world, is on
our docbook-tools list. He's one of the most agreeable people
you'll ever meet, and he just wrote me this:
> I'm certainly interested. I have a real problem with this
> mailing list though. It turns out that the ISP I use when I
> travel, and I travel too much ;-), has been blacklisted by
> whatever service this mailing list uses to avoid spammers. So I
> can't post here when I'm on the road.
> I'm so pissed about this that I'm "this close" to unsubscribing.
Since I'm going through the same stuff, I fully agree with him, and I
feel embarassed offering the sourceware services to the person I
really want to participate in my list. And to think I was so honored
when he joined... Without him my "next generation DocBook thrust"
will be severely diminished.
3. It turns out that the mechanism for white-listing a person
(i.e. allowing him through even if his ISP is black-listed) does
not do the job for me or for Norman or for anyone who uses an ISP
when traveling: Jason says you can't blank out a whole range of IP
address -- you can only blank them out one at a time. Almost all
ISPs give you a dynamic IP address....
4. When traveling I usually work offline, and I suspect others do too.
I wrote a dozen or more messages on three sourceware lists last
night, connected to send them off, and found that they had *all*
bounced. This makes the problem even worse in the case where it
manifests itself more easily.
This makes me think that our criteria are too harsh, too much of a
blanket statement, and that they get in the way of work instead of
promoting it.
Is there a better way? Who's a scholar on spam blacklisting?
I would propose that a "requirement" on the system be that people be
able to travel and hook up their laptops to major ISPs and still use
our system. Unfortunately outside the US it is not really an option
to telnet back home to send email: things are too slow and people have
to work offline.
next reply other threads:[~2000-12-30 6:08 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 24+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2000-12-30 6:08 Mark Galassi [this message]
2000-03-09 15:27 ` Mark Galassi
2000-12-30 6:08 ` Gerald Pfeifer
2000-03-09 15:45 ` Gerald Pfeifer
2000-12-30 6:08 ` Bob Manson
2000-03-09 19:25 ` Bob Manson
2000-12-30 6:08 ` Jason Molenda
2000-03-09 23:32 ` Jason Molenda
2000-12-30 6:08 ` Bob Manson
2000-03-10 14:40 ` Bob Manson
2000-12-30 6:08 ` Jim Kingdon
2000-03-10 7:32 ` Jim Kingdon
2000-12-30 6:08 ` Chris Faylor
2000-03-10 9:27 ` Chris Faylor
2000-12-30 6:08 ` Jim Kingdon
2000-03-09 16:13 ` Jim Kingdon
2000-12-30 6:08 ` Bob Manson
2000-03-09 19:35 ` Bob Manson
2000-12-30 6:08 ` Jason Molenda
2000-03-09 18:31 ` Jason Molenda
2000-12-30 6:08 ` Bart Veer
2000-03-10 3:35 ` Bart Veer
2000-12-30 6:08 ` Chris Faylor
2000-03-09 20:13 ` Chris Faylor
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=87vh2vafvt.fsf@portacipria.lanl.gov \
--to=rosalia@lanl.gov \
--cc=overseers@sourceware.cygnus.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for read-only IMAP folder(s) and NNTP newsgroup(s).