From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from omta034.useast.a.cloudfilter.net (omta034.useast.a.cloudfilter.net [44.202.169.33]) by sourceware.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id BA40C3858D3C for ; Tue, 23 Apr 2024 03:24:34 +0000 (GMT) DMARC-Filter: OpenDMARC Filter v1.4.2 sourceware.org BA40C3858D3C Authentication-Results: sourceware.org; dmarc=none (p=none dis=none) header.from=tromey.com Authentication-Results: sourceware.org; spf=pass smtp.mailfrom=tromey.com ARC-Filter: OpenARC Filter v1.0.0 sourceware.org BA40C3858D3C Authentication-Results: server2.sourceware.org; arc=none smtp.remote-ip=44.202.169.33 ARC-Seal: i=1; a=rsa-sha256; d=sourceware.org; s=key; t=1713842676; cv=none; b=Ek1Yc6DSbfn2pjVyriSEIcrjs5wIXKCFQXSomRHUNW0RJsls5llTC/CYa0kBUpKSW+jVsrKBVpKv1QpT1399FZbGHsEHX0ZxqJpG/WQeKuT3PzFT1j9qXY7QpnSW2slcDuwQTMbKTOo+JPczAmqnQUS60PgznPPMpdapeZo1DEI= ARC-Message-Signature: i=1; a=rsa-sha256; d=sourceware.org; s=key; t=1713842676; c=relaxed/simple; bh=7mlkpkac7n8g/E4JnSHLNZ0l55BL5DTP+4SULy+0SKs=; h=DKIM-Signature:From:To:Subject:Date:Message-ID:MIME-Version; b=GLGfJkec+YFpyh2qOUMCIyid3pShko/BIFdjuJyPRvO8zREmwz24oOYN0L8uHfhjgXoa5vMFjoBv6huhtkTfutWaNX4Xf3vELsyfYX7nzA3cp6CazBvtk4fFqVHzJnPrlZ6HfQ7aEqtT8Hllutz5EtFyEf7EjsXLCFyWk6rNgAc= ARC-Authentication-Results: i=1; server2.sourceware.org Received: from eig-obgw-6009a.ext.cloudfilter.net ([10.0.30.184]) by cmsmtp with ESMTPS id yxYHrwYPXs4yTz6lmrXE6B; Tue, 23 Apr 2024 03:24:34 +0000 Received: from box5379.bluehost.com ([162.241.216.53]) by cmsmtp with ESMTPS id z6llrxTIwnNCOz6llrLsD4; Tue, 23 Apr 2024 03:24:33 +0000 X-Authority-Analysis: v=2.4 cv=DKCJ4TNb c=1 sm=1 tr=0 ts=662729f1 a=ApxJNpeYhEAb1aAlGBBbmA==:117 a=ApxJNpeYhEAb1aAlGBBbmA==:17 a=raytVjVEu-sA:10 a=Qbun_eYptAEA:10 a=CDpvmW1mDVlN5E6uU-wA:9 DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; q=dns/txt; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=tromey.com; s=default; h=Content-Type:MIME-Version:Message-ID:Date:References:In-Reply-To :Subject:Cc:To:From:Sender:Reply-To:Content-Transfer-Encoding:Content-ID: Content-Description:Resent-Date:Resent-From:Resent-Sender:Resent-To:Resent-Cc :Resent-Message-ID:List-Id:List-Help:List-Unsubscribe:List-Subscribe: List-Post:List-Owner:List-Archive; bh=BNPIqL8454ktKLpIeX9nEb5bl7+/XflLrzixHdDnrdQ=; b=mdO0wYg3h/0S7MVyd5GAGu+rFS 35EQ9ZzUA5YkfkftnmLW9Tw+97dM8qcWe1yf7dqEGojvoU2/apU5QgLO5i0gwW1siZoRvgP43buGp DaXP4/wnvWurKPeL/4/ESeu8E; Received: from 97-122-86-252.hlrn.qwest.net ([97.122.86.252]:46946 helo=prentzel) by box5379.bluehost.com with esmtpsa (TLS1.2) tls TLS_ECDHE_RSA_WITH_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (Exim 4.96.2) (envelope-from ) id 1rz6lk-000RBt-2z; Mon, 22 Apr 2024 21:24:32 -0600 From: Tom Tromey To: Jason Merrill Cc: Tom Tromey , "Frank Ch. Eigler" , Overseers mailing list , Mark Wielaard , Joseph Myers , gcc@gcc.gnu.org, binutils@sourceware.org, gdb@sourceware.org, libc-alpha@sourceware.org Subject: Re: Updated Sourceware infrastructure plans In-Reply-To: (Jason Merrill's message of "Mon, 22 Apr 2024 22:55:59 -0400") References: <20240417232725.GC25080@gnu.wildebeest.org> <20240418173726.GD9069@redhat.com> <87v849qudy.fsf@tromey.com> X-Attribution: Tom Date: Mon, 22 Apr 2024 21:24:29 -0600 Message-ID: <87wmooep76.fsf@tromey.com> User-Agent: Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain X-AntiAbuse: This header was added to track abuse, please include it with any abuse report X-AntiAbuse: Primary Hostname - box5379.bluehost.com X-AntiAbuse: Original Domain - sourceware.org X-AntiAbuse: Originator/Caller UID/GID - [47 12] / [47 12] X-AntiAbuse: Sender Address Domain - tromey.com X-BWhitelist: no X-Source-IP: 97.122.86.252 X-Source-L: No X-Exim-ID: 1rz6lk-000RBt-2z X-Source: X-Source-Args: X-Source-Dir: X-Source-Sender: 97-122-86-252.hlrn.qwest.net (prentzel) [97.122.86.252]:46946 X-Source-Auth: tom+tromey.com X-Email-Count: 3 X-Org: HG=bhshared;ORG=bluehost; X-Source-Cap: ZWx5bnJvYmk7ZWx5bnJvYmk7Ym94NTM3OS5ibHVlaG9zdC5jb20= X-Local-Domain: yes X-CMAE-Envelope: MS4xfBgVL7/JDG4QMPXgPbloARZQde/5dzoGSAG6qZaxGoDPTp0WOf8lEz+pLWi0nEyBKXkWKYEauT2VsVqkZMbkt0TUuIqWqPLwBMB5QicDokJLkkGiXhtl P1x4T8Wh03/aD4HW1bwxTaWL07exgsErz21VAMDdrcqC4gldYEBOTFEZO/f+ulH4wv+ky/pv7NuPNMqaUrkQlVB+ksXoqVuOQhQ= X-Spam-Status: No, score=-3015.1 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00,DKIM_SIGNED,DKIM_VALID,JMQ_SPF_NEUTRAL,RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE,RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_H2,SPF_HELO_NONE,SPF_PASS,TXREP autolearn=no autolearn_force=no version=3.4.6 X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.6 (2021-04-09) on server2.sourceware.org List-Id: Jason> Someone mentioned earlier that gerrit was previously tried Jason> unsuccessfully. We tried it and gdb and then abandoned it. We tried to integrate it into the traditional gdb development style, having it send email to gdb-patches. I found these somewhat hard to read and in the end we agreed not to use it. I've come around again to thinking we should probably abandon email instead. For me the main benefit is that gerrit has patch tracking, unlike our current system, where losing patches is fairly routine. Jason> I think this is a common pattern in GCC at least: someone has an Jason> idea for a workflow improvement, and gets it working, but it Jason> isn't widely adopted. It essentially has to be mandated, IMO. For GCC this seems somewhat harder since the community is larger, so there's more people to convince. Tom