From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Return-Path: <overseers-return-8810-listarch-overseers=sources.redhat.com@sourceware.org>
Received: (qmail 32511 invoked by alias); 4 Mar 2006 16:39:46 -0000
Received: (qmail 32461 invoked by uid 22791); 4 Mar 2006 16:39:45 -0000
X-Spam-Check-By: sourceware.org
Received: from xproxy.gmail.com (HELO xproxy.gmail.com) (66.249.82.206)
    by sourceware.org (qpsmtpd/0.31) with ESMTP; Sat, 04 Mar 2006 16:39:45 +0000
Received: by xproxy.gmail.com with SMTP id t5so598143wxc
        for <overseers@sourceware.org>; Sat, 04 Mar 2006 08:39:43 -0800 (PST)
Received: by 10.70.54.20 with SMTP id c20mr5857810wxa;
        Sat, 04 Mar 2006 08:39:42 -0800 (PST)
Received: by 10.70.125.17 with HTTP; Sat, 4 Mar 2006 08:39:42 -0800 (PST)
Message-ID: <8f2776cb0603040839w339f3290r60ca6ff571ab5690@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Sat, 04 Mar 2006 16:39:00 -0000
From: "Jim Blandy" <jimb@red-bean.com>
To: "Jonathan Larmour" <jifl@jifvik.org>
Subject: Re: E-mail address in GDB Gnats
Cc: overseers@sourceware.org
In-Reply-To: <4409BE32.1090203@jifvik.org>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
Content-Disposition: inline
References: <8f2776cb0603031327r39342a02o8ae86c4830df2046@mail.gmail.com>
	 <4409BE32.1090203@jifvik.org>
Mailing-List: contact overseers-help@sourceware.org; run by ezmlm
Precedence: bulk
List-Archive: <http://sourceware.org/ml/overseers/>
List-Post: <mailto:overseers@sourceware.org>
List-Help: <mailto:overseers-help@sourceware.org>,
	<http://sourceware.org/ml/#faqs>
Sender: overseers-owner@sourceware.org
X-SW-Source: 2006-q1/txt/msg00114.txt.bz2

On 3/4/06, Jonathan Larmour <jifl@jifvik.org> wrote:
> I've changed the address for you in the "responsible" file, which is what
> maps the GNATS id "jimb" to an e-mail address.
>
> However I haven't touched anything else, including in particular all the
> bugs which were originated by you. While a global search and replace in
> /sourceware/gnats/gdb-db is possible, I'm not sure whether it's a good
> idea. If someone responsible wants to say it is ok, then I will do it.

Well, thanks very much for updating the "responsible file", at least, Jonat=
han.

I think a global search and replace is okay.  None of the bugs in the
public database were things Red Hat was waiting for, and I hope to
continue to contribute to GDB in my new job.