From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from pine.sfconservancy.org (pine.sfconservancy.org [162.242.171.33]) by sourceware.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 0D4323858CDB for ; Sat, 10 Sep 2022 17:55:48 +0000 (GMT) DMARC-Filter: OpenDMARC Filter v1.4.1 sourceware.org 0D4323858CDB Authentication-Results: sourceware.org; dmarc=none (p=none dis=none) header.from=sfconservancy.org Authentication-Results: sourceware.org; spf=pass smtp.mailfrom=sfconservancy.org Received: from mail.sfconservancy.org (pine.sfconservancy.org [IPv6:2001:4801:7822:103:be76:4eff:fe10:7c55]) (Authenticated sender: karen) by pine.sfconservancy.org (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 6CE5AE0FA for ; Sat, 10 Sep 2022 17:55:47 +0000 (UTC) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=simple/simple; d=sfconservancy.org; s=pine; t=1662832547; bh=sVNTtzkyz3ZPg2798VX5Y0IzXDhmib0YtR9GeonefI0=; h=Date:From:To:Subject:In-Reply-To:References:From; b=bRsCOPN5oMlXvPSCgQdoD8/T+GP3PzSrFgNyLyMGdg8VDDVizDgmUJwRutnG0cPYq xY1CVgMHoxMNDE8s10F+CU1aU9+ZaJ+rJpIe2A9HWnkA8qNkfO9NeDMFpv9pGaXWRK UAYBaoSBdmItTcs2uC1VPLu4Sg4TNK3NaddWRS/8iQ/sOjNSeTQGgcz2UWvH81RRPK nWH18yiyz+sPRSTAJMOKg0e21YSI/dJUT8yhw1dyKoy08ksVb4wbI7WezK/gt9ue7T EnYyNJSfHW+jbHRw03HftSnV2JvdBuQZ26ud5wUAReDnfZ1eqMzJ5i4MlbUEXU5eAd oPiKQYiF/ROrg== MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Date: Sat, 10 Sep 2022 13:55:47 -0400 From: "Karen M. Sandler" To: Overseers mailing list Subject: Re: SFC offers project membership to Sourceware; three video-chat discussion times with SFC available In-Reply-To: <1d8df057d6a7891e7af38de89a17b99f@sfconservancy.org> References: <1d8df057d6a7891e7af38de89a17b99f@sfconservancy.org> Message-ID: <8f4b73fb87d4619126f3594041e8bb22@sfconservancy.org> X-Sender: karen@sfconservancy.org User-Agent: Roundcube Webmail/1.2.3 X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.1 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00,DKIM_SIGNED,DKIM_VALID,DKIM_VALID_AU,DKIM_VALID_EF,SPF_HELO_NONE,SPF_PASS,TXREP,T_SCC_BODY_TEXT_LINE autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no version=3.4.6 X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.6 (2021-04-09) on server2.sourceware.org List-Id: On 2022-09-09 10:55, Karen M. Sandler via Overseers wrote: > On 2022-09-08 15:16, Daniel Pono Takamori via Overseers wrote: > >> We'd like to have a meeting where anyone can join and ask questions >> about the agreement or anything else about joining SFC. We'll be >> hosting >> 3 calls to let community members join when is best for them: 15:00 UTC >> Friday, 18:00 UTC Saturday and 17:00 UTC Monday on BigBlueButton. >> We'll >> post the links to this mailing list right before the calls. The second of these meetings is happening in about 5 minutes at the top of the hour! You can join here: https://bbb.sfconservancy.org/b/kar-yiq-pkx-amt To join this meeting by phone, dial: +1-718-247-9666 Then enter 27353 as the conference PIN number. I am including the notes from the first one below. If you can't make this one, we're doing another at 17:00 UTC Monday also on BigBlueButton. > And here are the links to the agreements: > >> https://sfconservancy.org/docs/sponsorship-agreement-template.pdf >> https://sfconservancy.org/docs/sponsorship-agreement-template.odt >> >> We're in the middle of updating our template to improve it a little >> bit, >> but there are no substantive changes. The most important section is >> building the governance section 6, for which the template has various >> suggested structures. > Rough Notes from previous meeting: Meeting 15:00 UTC, September 9 SFC staff shared links to the Fiscal Sponsorship Agreement template Fiscal sponsorship agreement talks about the structure, what's the best way to describe it? Concern: is defining the scope of the project difficult? There are legacy projects, etc Projects hosted by Sourceware will not become SFC projects * may need to write this into the agreement Sourceware is well resourced enough to bring more projects on Discussion about longevity and succession of Sourceware Making sure that governance of the project is independent from any company Discussed possible people to join the leadership committee Possibly anyone who has root should be on the committee? SFC recommends reaching out personally to overseers who have been active over the last 10 years to make sure they've seen the discussion about joining SFC and if they'd like to be involved.