From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 31699 invoked by alias); 5 Aug 2010 14:08:21 -0000 Received: (qmail 31685 invoked by uid 22791); 5 Aug 2010 14:08:20 -0000 X-SWARE-Spam-Status: No, hits=-1.8 required=5.0 tests=AWL,BAYES_00,DKIM_SIGNED,DKIM_VALID,DKIM_VALID_AU,FREEMAIL_FROM,RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE X-Spam-Check-By: sourceware.org Received: from mail-pw0-f41.google.com (HELO mail-pw0-f41.google.com) (209.85.160.41) by sourceware.org (qpsmtpd/0.43rc1) with ESMTP; Thu, 05 Aug 2010 14:08:15 +0000 Received: by pwj7 with SMTP id 7so150493pwj.0 for ; Thu, 05 Aug 2010 07:08:13 -0700 (PDT) MIME-Version: 1.0 Received: by 10.114.137.8 with SMTP id k8mr10850675wad.202.1281017292891; Thu, 05 Aug 2010 07:08:12 -0700 (PDT) Received: by 10.220.182.135 with HTTP; Thu, 5 Aug 2010 07:08:12 -0700 (PDT) In-Reply-To: <20100805120949.GA9158@redhat.com> References: <20100805120949.GA9158@redhat.com> Date: Thu, 05 Aug 2010 14:08:00 -0000 Message-ID: Subject: Re: No bug-binutils archive? From: "H.J. Lu" To: "Frank Ch. Eigler" Cc: overseers@sourceware.org Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Mailing-List: contact overseers-help@sourceware.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Id: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: , Sender: overseers-owner@sourceware.org X-SW-Source: 2010-q3/txt/msg00041.txt.bz2 On Thu, Aug 5, 2010 at 5:09 AM, Frank Ch. Eigler wrote: > Hi - > >> http://mail.gnu.org/archive/html/bug-binutils/ > > We don't maintain mail.gnu.org. =A0Was there a bad link to the > above URL somewhere on sourceware.org/gcc.gnu.org? The bad link is on http://www.sourceware.org/binutils/ The bug-binutils archive link doesn't work. --=20 H.J.