From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 26662 invoked by alias); 30 Mar 2012 14:44:21 -0000 Received: (qmail 26654 invoked by uid 22791); 30 Mar 2012 14:44:19 -0000 X-SWARE-Spam-Status: No, hits=-4.8 required=5.0 tests=AWL,BAYES_00,DKIM_SIGNED,DKIM_VALID,FREEMAIL_FROM,KHOP_RCVD_TRUST,KHOP_THREADED,RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW,RCVD_IN_HOSTKARMA_YE X-Spam-Check-By: sourceware.org Received: from mail-gx0-f169.google.com (HELO mail-gx0-f169.google.com) (209.85.161.169) by sourceware.org (qpsmtpd/0.43rc1) with ESMTP; Fri, 30 Mar 2012 14:43:56 +0000 Received: by ggeq1 with SMTP id q1so424496gge.0 for ; Fri, 30 Mar 2012 07:43:55 -0700 (PDT) MIME-Version: 1.0 Received: by 10.68.135.69 with SMTP id pq5mr10010720pbb.30.1333118635308; Fri, 30 Mar 2012 07:43:55 -0700 (PDT) Received: by 10.68.71.233 with HTTP; Fri, 30 Mar 2012 07:43:55 -0700 (PDT) In-Reply-To: <20120330144049.GI4954@elastic.org> References: <20120330144049.GI4954@elastic.org> Date: Fri, 30 Mar 2012 14:44:00 -0000 Message-ID: Subject: Re: Odd message while processing approval request. From: "Carlos O'Donell" To: "Frank Ch. Eigler" Cc: overseers@sourceware.org Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Mailing-List: contact overseers-help@sourceware.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Id: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: , Sender: overseers-owner@sourceware.org X-SW-Source: 2012-q1/txt/msg00139.txt.bz2 On Fri, Mar 30, 2012 at 10:40 AM, Frank Ch. Eigler wrote: > Hi - > > carlos wrote: > >> [...] >> While processing an approval request for glibc access for Siddhesh >> Poyarekar (siddhesh): >> [...] >> I clicked approve and got the message: >> Thank you. This request will now be processed by: None . > > That just means that no specific person handles these requests; > we roughly take turns. =A0Siddhesh's account is now active. Thanks :-) May I suggest a static warning message saying "If you see `None' as the person who is assigned to process your request this means no specific person is assigned to handle the request, but instead the administrators of the system will take turns handling the request" (or something less verbose)? Cheers, Carlos.