From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 73178 invoked by alias); 8 Dec 2018 07:53:10 -0000 Mailing-List: contact overseers-help@sourceware.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Id: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: , Sender: overseers-owner@sourceware.org Received: (qmail 73163 invoked by uid 89); 8 Dec 2018 07:53:09 -0000 Authentication-Results: sourceware.org; auth=none X-Spam-SWARE-Status: No, score=-0.0 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_20,RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE autolearn=ham version=3.3.2 spammy=tutorial, overseerssourcewareorg, overseers@sourceware.org, U*overseers X-HELO: mail-lf1-f48.google.com Received: from mail-lf1-f48.google.com (HELO mail-lf1-f48.google.com) (209.85.167.48) by sourceware.org (qpsmtpd/0.93/v0.84-503-g423c35a) with ESMTP; Sat, 08 Dec 2018 07:53:08 +0000 Received: by mail-lf1-f48.google.com with SMTP id e26so4652794lfc.2 for ; Fri, 07 Dec 2018 23:53:07 -0800 (PST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=jguk-org.20150623.gappssmtp.com; s=20150623; h=mime-version:references:in-reply-to:from:date:message-id:subject:to; bh=WaEG318ePzne5in60sNyOlh/tfPG7sgLVsjKU/4Cme8=; b=WkTx9GBxhhy5520lpznlpYMfMyCbqfq0+v54X5m+gaeZbDk7MESryVZLB2B/MO1+Su N55iuH4N608qg1uI6h+JZOzaYSLCrFDoci2ApGgs18moJV1huxfpyeq6KZxRVW4pg1RN xUMkdfoVnXoy2AMVTegFS9kv31PKdTly0DFEe5UJfs7ss0GDSu8xamk4zG166R5EBR0e UE/d9E124o2uLF4DW0I8JrCWUSIGVH2G0MQJrGtdPVLxdq7DCgtCOicB/CTtllLBJx7j cNost3Stp+sFNfmimAg4e+5fOqKxC41kFah7QT8NE/pnDZSzWxCTbt4oKK3BcrX5nu2z 7YaQ== MIME-Version: 1.0 References: <089ddcf5-789c-62b1-b131-c20850bf9854@jguk.org> <20181201200425.GA128408@elastic.org> In-Reply-To: From: Jonny Grant Date: Sat, 08 Dec 2018 07:53:00 -0000 Message-ID: Subject: Re: sourceware.org 404 link To: fche@elastic.org, overseers@sourceware.org Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" X-SW-Source: 2018-q4/txt/msg00058.txt.bz2 BTW, overseers@elastic.org is bouncing I think you meant overseers@sourceware.org On Sat, 8 Dec 2018 at 07:51, Jonny Grant wrote: > > Many thanks Frank > Yes, if there is a validator, would be good to run. > > On Sat, 1 Dec 2018 at 20:04, Frank Ch. Eigler wrote: > > > > Hi, Jonny - > > > > > Would you consider running the W3C link checker regularly on sourceware.org? > > > https://validator.w3.org/checklink > > > > Not a bad idea. > > > > > This page has a broken Tutorial html link > > > [...] > > > https://sourceware.org/systemtap/tutorial/ > > > https://sourceware.org/systemtap/langref/ > > > > These pages have been regenerated, thanks. > > > > > Line: 20http://sourceware.org/systemtap/wiki > > > *Status*: 403 FORBIDDEN > > > > ... except that this is a false positive. That particular validator > > program probably hit sourceware's overload self-protection mechanisms. > > We could probably run our own validator locally. > > > > > > - FChE