From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 28040 invoked by alias); 18 Apr 2008 20:20:04 -0000 Received: (qmail 28025 invoked by uid 22791); 18 Apr 2008 20:20:04 -0000 X-Spam-Check-By: sourceware.org Received: from fencepost.gnu.org (HELO fencepost.gnu.org) (140.186.70.10) by sourceware.org (qpsmtpd/0.31) with ESMTP; Fri, 18 Apr 2008 20:19:36 +0000 Received: from ams by fencepost.gnu.org with local (Exim 4.67) (envelope-from ) id 1Jmx3V-0001BQ-SJ; Fri, 18 Apr 2008 16:19:33 -0400 To: "Daniel Berlin" CC: sam@rfc1149.net, kirill@shutemov.name, fche@redhat.com, bernie@codewiz.org, harvey.harrison@gmail.com, overseers@gcc.gnu.org, tobi-grosser@web.de, gcc@gcc.gnu.org, dwmw2@infradead.org In-reply-to: <4aca3dc20804181307h50fedb4al848e33543b4fa4e1@mail.gmail.com> (dberlin@dberlin.org) Subject: Re: Official GCC git repository Reply-to: ams@gnu.org References: <20080326163011.GA20021@redhat.com> <2008-04-18-12-31-14+trackit+sam@rfc1149.net> <4aca3dc20804180845l7037b734u1881e69d3799019e@mail.gmail.com> <2008-04-18-18-15-50+trackit+sam@rfc1149.net> <4aca3dc20804181022v19855d9cm6911e2123aae7df8@mail.gmail.com> <2008-04-18-19-40-44+trackit+sam@rfc1149.net> <4aca3dc20804181156l355ef3ag5366f8f06a4094ff@mail.gmail.com> <2008-04-18-21-07-20+trackit+sam@rfc1149.net> <4aca3dc20804181216icce8ec5ja34287e03db87e1e@mail.gmail.com> <4aca3dc20804181307h50fedb4al848e33543b4fa4e1@mail.gmail.com> Message-Id: From: "Alfred M. Szmidt" Date: Fri, 18 Apr 2008 20:20:00 -0000 Mailing-List: contact overseers-help@sourceware.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Id: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: , Sender: overseers-owner@sourceware.org X-SW-Source: 2008-q2/txt/msg00037.txt.bz2 > > I think the mistake is to have them (git & hg) hosted on > > the same machine as svn. Having them on "hg.gcc.gnu.org" > > and "git.gcc.gnu.org" would allow to split the load between > > machines (even if "hg.gcc.gnu.org" and "git.gcc.gnu.org" > > are the same machines originally). > > This would be a great idea, if only we had more machines :) > Sadly, machines and dns names are tricky for political reasons > around gcc. > > Maybe they could be hosted on Savannah? The CVS repo. used to > be synced there. Used to, and then one day they just stopped doing it without telling anyone, and questions went unanswered. Sorry, that never happend AFAIK. I used the GCC CVS repo there, was never out of sync for me. So uh, thanks but no thanks :) Same thing can happen here; nothing extraordinary with that...