From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Gerald Pfeifer To: overseers@sourceware.cygnus.com Subject: RE2: Re: Why have the prior 2 "gcc Digest" emails *not* been digests?(fwd) Date: Sat, 30 Dec 2000 06:08:00 -0000 Message-id: X-SW-Source: 2000/msg00602.html A few days ago I forwarded another message by David, which Jason and/or Jeff were so kind to have a look at; perhaps the following provides the crucial hint? Gerald -- Gerald "Jerry" pfeifer@dbai.tuwien.ac.at http://www.dbai.tuwien.ac.at/~pfeifer/ ---------- Forwarded message ---------- From: David Presberg To: Gerald Pfeifer Cc: David.Presberg@conexant.com, gcc-help@gcc.gnu.org Date: Tue, 30 May 2000 11:59:58 -0400 (EDT) Subject: RE2: Re: Why have the prior 2 "gcc Digest" emails *not* been digests? Gerald -- Hmmm. Note the following (?) randomness: D gcc-digest-help@gcc.gnu.o 24May 08:29 941/31837 "gcc Digest 24 May 2000 08:29:36 -0000 Issue 674" T gcc-owner@gcc.gnu.org 25May 12:03 1469/52200 "gcc Digest 25 May 2000 12:03:47 -0000 Issue 675" T gcc-owner@gcc.gnu.org 26May 10:52 1269/45209 "gcc Digest 26 May 2000 10:52:18 -0000 Issue 676" T gcc-owner@gcc.gnu.org 27May 18:12 1193/40599 "gcc Digest 27 May 2000 18:12:10 -0000 Issue 677" D gcc-digest-help@gcc.gnu.o 28May 14:16 1126/35666 "gcc Digest 28 May 2000 14:16:49 -0000 Issue 678" D gcc-digest-help@gcc.gnu.o 29May 15:20 1056/36941 "gcc Digest 29 May 2000 15:20:23 -0000 Issue 679" T* gcc-owner@gcc.gnu.org 30May 15:30 1450/55179 "gcc Digest 30 May 2000 15:30:32 -0000 Issue 680" where: "D" == (proper digest). "T" == "Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii". but: "T*" == "Content-Type: multipart/mixed; Boundary="0__=882568EF005567FF8f9e8a93df938690918c882568EF005567FF". which latter is still not a proper digest-form email. And only the proper digests have the extra header-lines that explain about getting off the list, etc. [...] From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Gerald Pfeifer To: overseers@sourceware.cygnus.com Subject: RE2: Re: Why have the prior 2 "gcc Digest" emails *not* been digests?(fwd) Date: Tue, 30 May 2000 13:03:00 -0000 Message-ID: X-SW-Source: 2000-q2/msg00295.html Message-ID: <20000530130300.3mU9x_pFf2SZ5zYZyIQaQB2QLvKPaTUVXKFcylpJkFk@z> A few days ago I forwarded another message by David, which Jason and/or Jeff were so kind to have a look at; perhaps the following provides the crucial hint? Gerald -- Gerald "Jerry" pfeifer@dbai.tuwien.ac.at http://www.dbai.tuwien.ac.at/~pfeifer/ ---------- Forwarded message ---------- From: David Presberg To: Gerald Pfeifer Cc: David.Presberg@conexant.com, gcc-help@gcc.gnu.org Date: Tue, 30 May 2000 11:59:58 -0400 (EDT) Subject: RE2: Re: Why have the prior 2 "gcc Digest" emails *not* been digests? Gerald -- Hmmm. Note the following (?) randomness: D gcc-digest-help@gcc.gnu.o 24May 08:29 941/31837 "gcc Digest 24 May 2000 08:29:36 -0000 Issue 674" T gcc-owner@gcc.gnu.org 25May 12:03 1469/52200 "gcc Digest 25 May 2000 12:03:47 -0000 Issue 675" T gcc-owner@gcc.gnu.org 26May 10:52 1269/45209 "gcc Digest 26 May 2000 10:52:18 -0000 Issue 676" T gcc-owner@gcc.gnu.org 27May 18:12 1193/40599 "gcc Digest 27 May 2000 18:12:10 -0000 Issue 677" D gcc-digest-help@gcc.gnu.o 28May 14:16 1126/35666 "gcc Digest 28 May 2000 14:16:49 -0000 Issue 678" D gcc-digest-help@gcc.gnu.o 29May 15:20 1056/36941 "gcc Digest 29 May 2000 15:20:23 -0000 Issue 679" T* gcc-owner@gcc.gnu.org 30May 15:30 1450/55179 "gcc Digest 30 May 2000 15:30:32 -0000 Issue 680" where: "D" == (proper digest). "T" == "Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii". but: "T*" == "Content-Type: multipart/mixed; Boundary="0__=882568EF005567FF8f9e8a93df938690918c882568EF005567FF". which latter is still not a proper digest-form email. And only the proper digests have the extra header-lines that explain about getting off the list, etc. [...]