ht://dig

ht://dig

[Tom Tromey]

There's a new ht://Dig:

    http://www.htdig.org/dev/htdig-3.2/RELEASE.html

We definitely need a gnats list for sources so we can keep track of
what to do.  Add that to the to-do list...

Tom

Re: ht://dig

[Jason Molenda]

On Tue, Mar 06, 2001 at 02:59:32PM -0700, Tom Tromey wrote:
> There's a new ht://Dig:
> 
>     http://www.htdig.org/dev/htdig-3.2/RELEASE.html


It's still in beta - they started the 3.2 development series a long
time ago.  Except for the disk space shortage, the current version on
sourceware has been working remarkably well, I'd hesitate to mess with
it unless there was an especially well tested version to replace it 
with.

J

Re: ht://dig

[Hans-Peter Nilsson]

On Tue, 6 Mar 2001, Jason Molenda wrote:
> On Tue, Mar 06, 2001 at 02:59:32PM -0700, Tom Tromey wrote:
> > There's a new ht://Dig:
> >
> >     http://www.htdig.org/dev/htdig-3.2/RELEASE.html
>
> It's still in beta - they started the 3.2 development series a long
> time ago.  Except for the disk space shortage, the current version on
> sourceware has been working remarkably well, I'd hesitate to mess with
> it unless there was an especially well tested version to replace it
> with.

FWIW, I agree totally; in particular with the "especially well tested"
part. ;-)

I'd give it two months of empirically experienced (sp?) stability before
installing on a site such as sourceware.  Or the ultimate disk shortage,
whichever comes first. :-/

brgds, H-P