From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 9240 invoked by alias); 14 Jan 2003 00:17:53 -0000 Mailing-List: contact overseers-help@sources.redhat.com; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: , Sender: overseers-owner@sources.redhat.com Received: (qmail 9216 invoked from network); 14 Jan 2003 00:17:52 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO dair.pair.com) (209.68.1.49) by 209.249.29.67 with SMTP; 14 Jan 2003 00:17:52 -0000 Received: (qmail 90281 invoked by uid 20157); 14 Jan 2003 00:17:39 -0000 Received: from localhost (sendmail-bs@127.0.0.1) by localhost with SMTP; 14 Jan 2003 00:17:39 -0000 Date: Tue, 14 Jan 2003 00:17:00 -0000 From: Hans-Peter Nilsson X-X-Sender: hp@dair.pair.com To: overseers@sources.redhat.com Subject: Re: htdig/archives out-of-sync now? In-Reply-To: <20030113140044.A62405@molenda.com> Message-ID: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII X-SW-Source: 2003-q1/txt/msg00058.txt.bz2 > On Mon, Jan 13, 2003 at 04:35:49PM -0500, Christopher Faylor wrote: > > Some people in the cygwin mailing list have noticed that searches are > > not providing correct URLs. I assume this is probably due to some > > renumbering after last week's mysterious out-of-disk-space problem. > > > > HP, do we need to regenerate the indexes or will this just fix itself > > automatically? Assuming they mean archives from *this* year, then: On Mon, 13 Jan 2003, Jason Molenda wrote: (Reply time-space anomaly corrected.) > Yeah, my dirty little secret is that messages archived between > 2003-01-09 and 2003-01-13 may be switched around a tiny bit. > Just a tiny bit! And I figured it'd be all fresh and new and > not have links to it. ;) > > htdig will notice that the files have changed and should reindex. Other than that, they didn't happen to mention *what* URLs, what dates, were "incorrect" and what kind of incorrectness? No sybjects in mention "archive" or "search". brgds, H-P