From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 10721 invoked by alias); 15 May 2003 08:10:28 -0000 Mailing-List: contact overseers-help@sources.redhat.com; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: , Sender: overseers-owner@sources.redhat.com Received: (qmail 10676 invoked from network); 15 May 2003 08:10:27 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO vexpert.dbai.tuwien.ac.at) (128.131.111.2) by sources.redhat.com with SMTP; 15 May 2003 08:10:27 -0000 Received: from [128.131.111.52] (naos [128.131.111.52]) by vexpert.dbai.tuwien.ac.at (Postfix) with ESMTP id C31E213791 for ; Thu, 15 May 2003 10:10:26 +0200 (CEST) Date: Thu, 15 May 2003 08:10:00 -0000 From: Gerald Pfeifer To: overseers@gcc.gnu.org Subject: Further anti-spam measures? Message-ID: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII X-SW-Source: 2003-q2/txt/msg00160.txt.bz2 Folks, Chris, today I noticed the following piece of spam on the gcc list. Given that the gnu.org machines already run SpamAssassin, how about honoring X-Spam-* flags added by them? That is, if we get something from fencepost.gnu.org which carries an X-Spam-* header, unconditionally treat that message as spam? Gerald PS: As an aside, I get $\infinity$ more spam for gerald@prep.ai.mit.edu and close to $\infinity$ more spam for gerald@gnu.org (both of which I never used) than to the gcc lists or gerald@gcc.gnu.org. Thanks! ---------- Forwarded message ---------- Received: from unknown (HELO fencepost.gnu.org) (199.232.76.164) by sources.redhat.com with SMTP; 14 May 2003 22:25:13 -0000 Received: from monty-python.gnu.org ([199.232.76.173]) by fencepost.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.10) id 19G4gQ-0004qY-00 for gcc@gnu.org; Wed, 14 May 2003 18:25:10 -0400 Received: from mail by monty-python.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.10.13) id 19G4fS-0002wG-00 for gcc@gnu.org; Wed, 14 May 2003 18:24:13 -0400 Received: from gnuftp.gnu.org ([199.232.41.6]) by monty-python.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.10.13) id 19G4et-0002I5-00 for gcc@gnu.org; Wed, 14 May 2003 18:23:35 -0400 Received: from [217.10.169.185] (helo=ok61079.com) by gnuftp.gnu.org with smtp (Exim 4.10.13) id 19G4eB-0004LY-00 for gcc@gnu.org; Wed, 14 May 2003 18:22:53 -0400 From: "James Membe" Reply-To: ja8@london.com To: gcc@gnu.org Date: Thu, 15 May 2003 06:21:21 +0800 Subject: Urgent Appeal MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Message-Id: X-Spam-Status: Yes, hits=14.7 required=5.0 tests=DEAR_FRIEND,LINES_OF_YELLING,LINES_OF_YELLING_2, LINES_OF_YELLING_3,MIME_LONG_LINE_QP,RATWARE_OE_MALFORMED, SPAM_PHRASE_03_05,UPPERCASE_75_100,US_DOLLARS,US_DOLLARS_3 version=2.41 X-Spam-Flag: YES X-Spam-Level: ************** X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.41 (1.115.2.8-2002-09-05-exp) X-Spam-Report: 14.70 hits, 5 required; * 4.4 -- X-Mailer contains malformed Outlook Express version * 2.7 -- BODY: How dear can you be if you don't know my name? * 2.6 -- BODY: Nigerian scam key phrase (million dollars) * 2.1 -- BODY: Nigerian scam key phrase ($NN,NNN,NNN.NN) * -0.8 -- BODY: 3 WHOLE LINES OF YELLING DETECTED * -0.7 -- BODY: 2 WHOLE LINES OF YELLING DETECTED * 0.3 -- BODY: A WHOLE LINE OF YELLING DETECTED * 0.1 -- BODY: Spam phrases score is 03 to 05 (medium) [score: 4] * 2.0 -- RAW: Quoted-printable line longer than 76 characters * 2.0 -- message body is 75-100% uppercase JAMES.MUTUMBA MEMBE. UNITED KINGDOM.TEL/FAX:448717333652 DEAR FRIEND, [...]