* And incidentally, speaking of ~ftp space on sourceware
@ 2002-10-10 1:14 Jason Molenda
2002-10-10 1:41 ` Gerald Pfeifer
0 siblings, 1 reply; 5+ messages in thread
From: Jason Molenda @ 2002-10-10 1:14 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: overseers
There's 300MB free. Top users are
3706024 gcc
1309932 cygwin
1128596 gdb
336828 binutils
276380 ecos
249480 sourcenav
245480 ha
244792 glibc
Probably time to cull some old snapshots from gcc (~1.8GB) and such.
J
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 5+ messages in thread
* Re: And incidentally, speaking of ~ftp space on sourceware
2002-10-10 1:14 And incidentally, speaking of ~ftp space on sourceware Jason Molenda
@ 2002-10-10 1:41 ` Gerald Pfeifer
2004-03-20 1:56 ` Christopher Faylor
0 siblings, 1 reply; 5+ messages in thread
From: Gerald Pfeifer @ 2002-10-10 1:41 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Jason Molenda; +Cc: overseers
On Thu, 10 Oct 2002, Jason Molenda wrote:
> There's 300MB free. Top users are
>
> 3706024 gcc
> [...]
> Probably time to cull some old snapshots from gcc (~1.8GB) and such.
$ pwd
/sourceware/ftp/anonftp/pub/gcc/snapshots
$ rm -rf 2002-0[678]*
$ rm *3.1.1*
$ df -k .
Filesystem 1k-blocks Used Available Use% Mounted on
/dev/sdc3 8424924 6969332 1455592 83% /sourceware/ftp
Gerald
PS: In general, anyone feel free to remove anything from
pub/gcc/snapshots that is older than two months, I'd say...
--
Gerald "Jerry" pfeifer@dbai.tuwien.ac.at http://www.dbai.tuwien.ac.at/~pfeifer/
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 5+ messages in thread
* Re: And incidentally, speaking of ~ftp space on sourceware
2002-10-10 1:41 ` Gerald Pfeifer
@ 2004-03-20 1:56 ` Christopher Faylor
2004-03-20 9:07 ` Joseph S. Myers
2004-03-31 18:05 ` Gerald Pfeifer
0 siblings, 2 replies; 5+ messages in thread
From: Christopher Faylor @ 2004-03-20 1:56 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: overseers, Gerald Pfeifer
On Thu, Oct 10, 2002 at 10:41:08AM +0200, Gerald Pfeifer wrote:
>On Thu, 10 Oct 2002, Jason Molenda wrote:
>> There's 300MB free. Top users are
>>
>> 3706024 gcc
>> [...]
>> Probably time to cull some old snapshots from gcc (~1.8GB) and such.
>
> $ pwd
> /sourceware/ftp/anonftp/pub/gcc/snapshots
>
> $ rm -rf 2002-0[678]*
> $ rm *3.1.1*
>
> $ df -k .
> Filesystem 1k-blocks Used Available Use% Mounted on
> /dev/sdc3 8424924 6969332 1455592 83% /sourceware/ftp
>
>Gerald
>
>PS: In general, anyone feel free to remove anything from
>pub/gcc/snapshots that is older than two months, I'd say...
Just resurrecting an old, pertinent thread.
ftp is suffering from the same fate as www. Is it safe to always assume that
old gcc snapshots can be deleted? If so, I'll write a cron job to do so.
I'm moving snapshots older than 2004-01-18 out of the ftp directory and will
delete them entirely if I get the "ok".
cgf
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 5+ messages in thread
* Re: And incidentally, speaking of ~ftp space on sourceware
2004-03-20 1:56 ` Christopher Faylor
@ 2004-03-20 9:07 ` Joseph S. Myers
2004-03-31 18:05 ` Gerald Pfeifer
1 sibling, 0 replies; 5+ messages in thread
From: Joseph S. Myers @ 2004-03-20 9:07 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Christopher Faylor; +Cc: overseers, Gerald Pfeifer
On Fri, 19 Mar 2004, Christopher Faylor wrote:
> ftp is suffering from the same fate as www. Is it safe to always assume that
> old gcc snapshots can be deleted? If so, I'll write a cron job to do so.
>
> I'm moving snapshots older than 2004-01-18 out of the ftp directory and will
> delete them entirely if I get the "ok".
Translators are currently pointed to the 3.4-20040206 snapshot for context
for messages to translate by
<http://www2.iro.umontreal.ca/~pinard/po/registry.cgi?domain=gcc> and will
be until 3.4 comes out. In general it's the case that after a new release
branch is created there will be one snapshot that should have a persistent
URL until the release comes out.
--
Joseph S. Myers
jsm@polyomino.org.uk
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 5+ messages in thread
* Re: And incidentally, speaking of ~ftp space on sourceware
2004-03-20 1:56 ` Christopher Faylor
2004-03-20 9:07 ` Joseph S. Myers
@ 2004-03-31 18:05 ` Gerald Pfeifer
1 sibling, 0 replies; 5+ messages in thread
From: Gerald Pfeifer @ 2004-03-31 18:05 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Christopher Faylor; +Cc: overseers
On Fri, 19 Mar 2004, Christopher Faylor wrote:
> ftp is suffering from the same fate as www. Is it safe to always assume that
> old gcc snapshots can be deleted? If so, I'll write a cron job to do so.
Thinking more about this, and considering Joseph's feedback, we might want
to differentiate between snapshots of the different branches.
Currently, for GCC 3.3, I guess it's safe to remove everything predating
GCC 3.3.3, and for GCC 3.4 and I think it's safe to remove everything
older than 6 weeks.
Having a script would be great; if you could add that to gccadmins crontab
and the maintainer-scripts directory in GCC CVS, Joseph and myself could
then help maintaining that script.
> I'm moving snapshots older than 2004-01-18 out of the ftp directory and
> will delete them entirely if I get the "ok".
Okay. Thanks!
Gerald
--
Gerald Pfeifer (Jerry) gerald@pfeifer.com http://www.pfeifer.com/gerald/
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 5+ messages in thread
end of thread, other threads:[~2004-03-20 9:07 UTC | newest]
Thread overview: 5+ messages (download: mbox.gz / follow: Atom feed)
-- links below jump to the message on this page --
2002-10-10 1:14 And incidentally, speaking of ~ftp space on sourceware Jason Molenda
2002-10-10 1:41 ` Gerald Pfeifer
2004-03-20 1:56 ` Christopher Faylor
2004-03-20 9:07 ` Joseph S. Myers
2004-03-31 18:05 ` Gerald Pfeifer
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for read-only IMAP folder(s) and NNTP newsgroup(s).