public inbox for overseers@sourceware.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Gerald Pfeifer <pfeifer@dbai.tuwien.ac.at>
To: Jason Molenda <jason-gcclist@molenda.com>
Cc: overseers@gcc.gnu.org, Matthias Klose <doko@cs.tu-berlin.de>
Subject: Re: Monthly mailing list archives: monthly-ml-tasks
Date: Sun, 18 Jul 2004 11:48:00 -0000	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <Pine.BSF.4.58.0407181346060.88645@acrux.dbai.tuwien.ac.at> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20040616144741.A95127@molenda.com>

On Wed, 16 Jun 2004, Jason Molenda wrote:
>>   5 6 1 * * cd /sourceware/infra/monthly-ml-tasks; exec ./DOIT.sh
>>
>> Indeed, this job is run on the first day of the month, at 6:05.  Are
>> there any objections if I move this to 0:07?
> Unless I'm remembering incorrectly, there is a entry for root which
> HUPs apache a little while after the redirects/index pages have been
> updated.  My guess is that the time of this crontab is related to
> that crontab.

Interestingly, it isn't really; the first rehup takes place before the
monthly-ml-tasks script is run:

  #### Re-hup the daemon each month so that the new ml-redirects
  #### can be loaded (cf infra/monthly-ml-tasks/update-http-redirects.sh)
  ####
  #### This should run shortly after listarch's monthly list duty
  #### script runs.
  # Those scripts can take oddly long amounts of time to finish, so two
  # extra rehups are here to ensure it gets done.

  45 5,8,12 1 * * /sbin/service httpd reload>/dev/null

I have now moved the monthyl-ml-tasks script from 6:05 to 3:05, to reduce
the windows of "outdated-ness" that Matthias complained about...

> I'd recommend leaving some time between the two processes -- an hour
> say -- so that any mail archiving that is in the middle of happening
> has a chance to clear out.  But that's just MHO.  I purposefully wrote
> in the 6 hour delay originally out of laziness - I didn't want to think
> through the consequences of timing it closely and didn't think it really
> mattered if there was a gap of a few hours.

...so given what you wrote above, the root crontab now should be fine,
without changes?

Gerald

  reply	other threads:[~2004-07-18 11:48 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 4+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2004-06-18  0:42 Gerald Pfeifer
2004-06-18  7:15 ` Jason Molenda
2004-07-18 11:48   ` Gerald Pfeifer [this message]
2004-07-19  9:38     ` Jason Molenda

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=Pine.BSF.4.58.0407181346060.88645@acrux.dbai.tuwien.ac.at \
    --to=pfeifer@dbai.tuwien.ac.at \
    --cc=doko@cs.tu-berlin.de \
    --cc=jason-gcclist@molenda.com \
    --cc=overseers@gcc.gnu.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for read-only IMAP folder(s) and NNTP newsgroup(s).