From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 15405 invoked by alias); 18 Nov 2003 15:53:18 -0000 Mailing-List: contact overseers-help@sources.redhat.com; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: , Sender: overseers-owner@sources.redhat.com Received: (qmail 15398 invoked from network); 18 Nov 2003 15:53:17 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO mx1.redhat.com) (66.187.233.31) by sources.redhat.com with SMTP; 18 Nov 2003 15:53:17 -0000 Received: from int-mx1.corp.redhat.com (int-mx1.corp.redhat.com [172.16.52.254]) by mx1.redhat.com (8.11.6/8.11.6) with ESMTP id hAIFrFH00443 for ; Tue, 18 Nov 2003 10:53:15 -0500 Received: from lacrosse.corp.redhat.com (lacrosse.corp.redhat.com [172.16.52.154]) by int-mx1.corp.redhat.com (8.11.6/8.11.6) with ESMTP id hAIFrEw07963; Tue, 18 Nov 2003 10:53:14 -0500 Received: from localhost (mgalgoci@localhost) by lacrosse.corp.redhat.com (8.11.6/8.11.6) with ESMTP id hAIFrE106451; Tue, 18 Nov 2003 10:53:14 -0500 X-Authentication-Warning: lacrosse.corp.redhat.com: mgalgoci owned process doing -bs Date: Tue, 18 Nov 2003 15:53:00 -0000 From: Matthew Galgoci X-X-Sender: mgalgoci@lacrosse.corp.redhat.com To: Andrew Cagney cc: law@redhat.com, Subject: Re: [Fwd: failure notice] In-Reply-To: <3FBA2F76.9040908@redhat.com> Message-ID: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII X-SW-Source: 2003-q4/txt/msg00155.txt.bz2 On Tue, 18 Nov 2003, Andrew Cagney wrote: > > In message <3FB8E7D2.6030203@redhat.com>, Andrew Cagney writes: > > >This is a multi-part message in MIME format. > > >--------------000300030405000306090207 > > >Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii; format=flowed > > >Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit > > > > > >What triggers this? > > Could be a content issue. Hard to guess what it might be without any of > > the content -- subject lines & message body in particular. Our spam filters > > are pretty aggressive (thank god :-) > > I get that all the time. This: > > "Sorry, I've been told to reject your posts." > > I believe is new? I can see how ac131313 might be seen as a forged random spam by someone just glancing at headers and quick on the trigger. Or perhaps some spammer has been forging a from of ac131313@redhat.com. *shrug* I dunno. It's spam like that this is causing us to look impliment whitelisting of valid @redhat.com email addresses at Red Hat. Anyhow, I'm not sure how the spam filters on sources works, but someone ought to check if andrew's address somehow got added to a blacklist and possibly whitelist his address. -- Matthew Galgoci System Administrator Red Hat, Inc 919.754.3700 x44155