From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 6787 invoked by alias); 25 Sep 2003 09:49:24 -0000 Mailing-List: contact overseers-help@sources.redhat.com; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: , Sender: overseers-owner@sources.redhat.com Received: (qmail 6767 invoked from network); 25 Sep 2003 09:49:24 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO gold.csi.cam.ac.uk) (131.111.8.12) by sources.redhat.com with SMTP; 25 Sep 2003 09:49:24 -0000 Received: from student.cusu.cam.ac.uk ([131.111.179.82] helo=kern.srcf.societies.cam.ac.uk) by gold.csi.cam.ac.uk with esmtp (Exim 4.20) id 1A2SkQ-00070s-NZ for overseers@sources.redhat.com; Thu, 25 Sep 2003 10:49:18 +0100 Received: from jsm28 (helo=localhost) by kern.srcf.societies.cam.ac.uk with local-esmtp (Exim 3.35 #1 (Debian)) id 1A2SkQ-0001t2-00 for ; Thu, 25 Sep 2003 10:49:18 +0100 Date: Thu, 25 Sep 2003 09:49:00 -0000 From: "Joseph S. Myers" X-X-Sender: jsm28@kern.srcf.societies.cam.ac.uk To: overseers@sources.redhat.com Subject: Virus / spam messages on lists Message-ID: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII X-Cam-ScannerInfo: http://www.cam.ac.uk/cs/email/scanner/ X-Cam-AntiVirus: No virus found X-Cam-SpamDetails: Not scanned X-SW-Source: 2003-q3/txt/msg00228.txt.bz2 A few "virus removed" messages have appeared on libc-alpha, e.g. . These messages don't appear to mention libc-alpha anywhere in the To or CC headers - I thought there was an antispam measure requiring the list name to appear in those headers? Or is that only for the GCC lists? gcc-regression gives a subjective impression of receiving rather more spam than the other GCC lists. Are there some antispam checks enabled for other lists that are disabled for gcc-regression? -- Joseph S. Myers jsm@polyomino.org.uk