From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 18626 invoked by alias); 5 Feb 2008 20:37:12 -0000 Received: (qmail 18615 invoked by uid 22791); 5 Feb 2008 20:37:11 -0000 X-Spam-Check-By: sourceware.org Received: from vexpert.dbai.tuwien.ac.at (HELO vexpert.dbai.tuwien.ac.at) (128.131.111.2) by sourceware.org (qpsmtpd/0.31) with ESMTP; Tue, 05 Feb 2008 20:36:52 +0000 Received: from acrux.dbai.tuwien.ac.at (acrux [128.131.111.60]) by vexpert.dbai.tuwien.ac.at (Postfix) with ESMTP id 8462739120; Tue, 5 Feb 2008 21:36:48 +0100 (CET) Date: Tue, 05 Feb 2008 22:37:00 -0000 From: Gerald Pfeifer To: Ben Elliston cc: overseers@sourceware.org Subject: Re: PATCH: GCC's wwwdocs/CVSROOT/modules In-Reply-To: <1202184187.22039.4.camel@localhost> Message-ID: References: <1202184187.22039.4.camel@localhost> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII Mailing-List: contact overseers-help@sourceware.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Id: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: , Sender: overseers-owner@sourceware.org X-SW-Source: 2008-q1/txt/msg00056.txt.bz2 Hi Ben, On Tue, 5 Feb 2008, Ben Elliston wrote: > While looking through this repository's CVSROOT (trying to work out what > would be involved in getting the web pages under SVN source control), I > noticed that the modules file appeared to have been copied from the GCC > CVS repository at some stage. None of it makes sense for the wwwdocs > repository and can be safely pruned. the modules file actually hasn't been copied from the GCC CVS repository, but we are looking at the original CVS repository, just that the only active thing there these days is the wwwdocs module. :-) > OK to commit? I believe this is fine to commit, but let's wait a day or two to see whether anybody else has any objections/inputs. And thanks for looking at the migration of the wwwdocs module. As far as I can see, the key aspect to consider is the automated checkout following changes being committed. Gerald