From: Mo DeJong <mdejong@cygnus.com>
To: overseers@sourceware.cygnus.com
Subject: Mail Header without the Reply-To line
Date: Sat, 30 Dec 2000 06:08:00 -0000 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <Pine.SOL.3.91.1000723221840.3453F-100000@cse.cygnus.com> (raw)
This request was sent to the sourcenav mailing list.
The user points out that it would be easier to
reply to the correct address if we had a reply to
field.
Reply-To: sourcenav@sources.redhat.com
I think it is a good idea. There is no reason
to get two emails everytime someone responds to
a message you posted.
Mo DeJong
Red Hat Inc
---------- Forwarded message ----------
Date: Mon, 24 Jul 2000 00:57:11 -0400
From: Gilles J. Seguin <segg@infonet.ca>
To: sourcenav@sources.redhat.com
Subject: Mail Header without the Reply-To line
Subject: Re: Where is the CVS repository?
Date: Sun, 23 Jul 2000 18:54:07 -0700 (PDT)
From: Mo
Reply-To: S-N <sourcenav@sources.redhat.com>
To: Ben
Mo DeJong wrote:
>
(...)
We do not have the Reply-To line like in the example above, it has
been added manually.
I think the feature can save unwanted mail or redirection where
we want it.
WARNING: multiple messages have this Message-ID
From: Mo DeJong <mdejong@cygnus.com>
To: overseers@sourceware.cygnus.com
Subject: Mail Header without the Reply-To line
Date: Sun, 23 Jul 2000 22:21:00 -0000 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <Pine.SOL.3.91.1000723221840.3453F-100000@cse.cygnus.com> (raw)
Message-ID: <20000723222100.JURkIQ2babXVNIt_fiIo_-MFwQWG6Wd02juKAiHwAvU@z> (raw)
This request was sent to the sourcenav mailing list.
The user points out that it would be easier to
reply to the correct address if we had a reply to
field.
Reply-To: sourcenav@sources.redhat.com
I think it is a good idea. There is no reason
to get two emails everytime someone responds to
a message you posted.
Mo DeJong
Red Hat Inc
---------- Forwarded message ----------
Date: Mon, 24 Jul 2000 00:57:11 -0400
From: Gilles J. Seguin <segg@infonet.ca>
To: sourcenav@sources.redhat.com
Subject: Mail Header without the Reply-To line
Subject: Re: Where is the CVS repository?
Date: Sun, 23 Jul 2000 18:54:07 -0700 (PDT)
From: Mo
Reply-To: S-N <sourcenav@sources.redhat.com>
To: Ben
Mo DeJong wrote:
>
(...)
We do not have the Reply-To line like in the example above, it has
been added manually.
I think the feature can save unwanted mail or redirection where
we want it.
next reply other threads:[~2000-12-30 6:08 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 14+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2000-12-30 6:08 Mo DeJong [this message]
2000-07-23 22:21 ` Mo DeJong
2000-12-30 6:08 ` Ian Lance Taylor
2000-07-23 22:24 ` Ian Lance Taylor
2000-12-30 6:08 ` Chris Faylor
2000-07-24 8:00 ` Chris Faylor
-- strict thread matches above, loose matches on Subject: below --
2000-12-30 6:08 Phil Edwards
2000-07-24 8:33 ` Phil Edwards
2000-12-30 6:08 ` Chris Faylor
2000-07-24 8:48 ` Chris Faylor
2000-12-30 6:08 Phil Edwards
2000-07-24 9:19 ` Phil Edwards
2000-12-30 6:08 ` Chris Faylor
2000-07-24 9:21 ` Chris Faylor
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=Pine.SOL.3.91.1000723221840.3453F-100000@cse.cygnus.com \
--to=mdejong@cygnus.com \
--cc=overseers@sourceware.cygnus.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for read-only IMAP folder(s) and NNTP newsgroup(s).