public inbox for overseers@sourceware.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Benjamin Kosnik <bkoz@redhat.com>
To: overseers@sources.redhat.com
Subject: Re: suggested change to sources.redhat.com page
Date: Sat, 30 Dec 2000 06:08:00 -0000	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <Pine.SOL.3.91.1001101122128.490A-100000@taarna.cygnus.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20001101141013.A18757@disaster.jaj.com>

> Hear, hear.  I personally know three people who have read the
> sources.redhat page and become interested in the projects specifically
> because it was lighthearted, and therefore obviously /not/ an "official"
> RH company-related site.  They're interested in libre software, but not
> interested in corporate-managed collaboration, and that's the impression
> that an officious-sounding legalese disclaimer on the sources.redhat page
> would make.

corporate-managed collaborations... funny.

I also am in support of keeping 
sources.redhat.com/sourceware.cygnus.com/whatever free of vauge marketing 
assertions. 

Furthermore, I think a web page with a bit of humor, especially for 
otherwise serious topics like compilers and libraries, is a fine idea. (I know reasonable 
people can and do differ about this subject, but allowing optional humor 
is a right that should be preseved.)

-benjamin

WARNING: multiple messages have this Message-ID
From: Benjamin Kosnik <bkoz@redhat.com>
To: overseers@sources.redhat.com
Subject: Re: suggested change to sources.redhat.com page
Date: Wed, 01 Nov 2000 12:26:00 -0000	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <Pine.SOL.3.91.1001101122128.490A-100000@taarna.cygnus.com> (raw)
Message-ID: <20001101122600.ZG0h8phwQv0eBoEXdXC3ELxN8M_0ii46SduVR0D2eTI@z> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20001101141013.A18757@disaster.jaj.com>

> Hear, hear.  I personally know three people who have read the
> sources.redhat page and become interested in the projects specifically
> because it was lighthearted, and therefore obviously /not/ an "official"
> RH company-related site.  They're interested in libre software, but not
> interested in corporate-managed collaboration, and that's the impression
> that an officious-sounding legalese disclaimer on the sources.redhat page
> would make.

corporate-managed collaborations... funny.

I also am in support of keeping 
sources.redhat.com/sourceware.cygnus.com/whatever free of vauge marketing 
assertions. 

Furthermore, I think a web page with a bit of humor, especially for 
otherwise serious topics like compilers and libraries, is a fine idea. (I know reasonable 
people can and do differ about this subject, but allowing optional humor 
is a right that should be preseved.)

-benjamin

  parent reply	other threads:[~2000-12-30  6:08 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 24+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2000-12-30  6:08 Mark Sobell
2000-11-01 10:09 ` Mark Sobell
2000-12-30  6:08 ` Jason Molenda
2000-11-01 10:37   ` Jason Molenda
2000-12-30  6:08   ` Phil Edwards
2000-11-01 11:04     ` Phil Edwards
2000-12-30  6:08     ` Christopher Faylor
2000-11-01 11:35       ` Christopher Faylor
2000-12-30  6:08     ` Benjamin Kosnik [this message]
2000-11-01 12:26       ` Benjamin Kosnik
2000-12-30  6:08   ` Jason Molenda
2000-11-01 10:53     ` Jason Molenda
2000-12-30  6:08   ` Frank Ch. Eigler
2000-11-01 10:49     ` Frank Ch. Eigler
2000-12-30  6:08   ` Jim Kingdon
2000-11-01 13:52     ` Jim Kingdon
2000-12-30  6:08     ` sources.redhat.com Paul Weinstein
2000-11-01 16:49       ` sources.redhat.com Paul Weinstein
2000-12-30  6:08       ` sources.redhat.com Tom Tromey
2000-11-02 12:07         ` sources.redhat.com Tom Tromey
2000-12-30  6:08         ` sources.redhat.com Paul Weinstein
2000-11-02 13:49           ` sources.redhat.com Paul Weinstein
2000-12-30  6:08 ` suggested change to sources.redhat.com page Ian Lance Taylor
2000-11-01 11:59   ` Ian Lance Taylor

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=Pine.SOL.3.91.1001101122128.490A-100000@taarna.cygnus.com \
    --to=bkoz@redhat.com \
    --cc=overseers@sources.redhat.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for read-only IMAP folder(s) and NNTP newsgroup(s).