From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from gnu.wildebeest.org (gnu.wildebeest.org [45.83.234.184]) by sourceware.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id EF1673858C50; Tue, 18 Oct 2022 09:50:38 +0000 (GMT) DMARC-Filter: OpenDMARC Filter v1.4.1 sourceware.org EF1673858C50 Authentication-Results: sourceware.org; dmarc=none (p=none dis=none) header.from=klomp.org Authentication-Results: sourceware.org; spf=pass smtp.mailfrom=klomp.org Received: from reform (deer0x0e.wildebeest.org [172.31.17.144]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ADH-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by gnu.wildebeest.org (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 9607B3000913; Tue, 18 Oct 2022 11:50:37 +0200 (CEST) Received: by reform (Postfix, from userid 1000) id F0BD32E822F5; Tue, 18 Oct 2022 11:50:20 +0200 (CEST) Date: Tue, 18 Oct 2022 11:50:20 +0200 From: Mark Wielaard To: Siddhesh Poyarekar Cc: Overseers mailing list , gdb@sourceware.org, libc-alpha@sourceware.org, binutils@sourceware.org, gcc@gcc.gnu.org Subject: Re: Toolchain Infrastructure project statement of support Message-ID: References: <2513b668-9ebd-9e78-7263-dc24f4a9558a@redhat.com> <20221013182529.sm76fysq37sv754x@cgf.cx> <9c0a9111-07b1-3617-c5c8-4b12e616f985@gotplt.org> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <9c0a9111-07b1-3617-c5c8-4b12e616f985@gotplt.org> X-Spam-Status: No, score=-3033.2 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00,JMQ_SPF_NEUTRAL,KAM_DMARC_STATUS,SPF_HELO_NONE,SPF_PASS,TXREP autolearn=no autolearn_force=no version=3.4.6 X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.6 (2021-04-09) on server2.sourceware.org List-Id: Hi Siddhesh, On Mon, Oct 17, 2022 at 12:11:53PM -0400, Siddhesh Poyarekar wrote: > There seems to be little to discuss from the GNU toolchain perspective IMO; Yes, it is clear you don't want any discussion or answer any questions about the proposals, how funds can be used, what the budget is, what the requirements are, how the governance structure works, what alternatives we have, etc. But personally I think it is healthy to have real discussions, doing resource analysis, creating public roadmaps, collecting infrastructure enahancement requests, discuss how to organize, argue about the needed budget and how to use funding most efficiently, etc. To make sure that sourceware keeps being a healthy and viable free software infrastructure project for the next 24 years, hopefully including the various GNU toolchain projects. Cheers, Mark