From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from us-smtp-delivery-124.mimecast.com (us-smtp-delivery-124.mimecast.com [170.10.129.124]) by sourceware.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 3316638582A0 for ; Mon, 24 Oct 2022 12:40:54 +0000 (GMT) DMARC-Filter: OpenDMARC Filter v1.4.1 sourceware.org 3316638582A0 Authentication-Results: sourceware.org; dmarc=pass (p=none dis=none) header.from=redhat.com Authentication-Results: sourceware.org; spf=pass smtp.mailfrom=redhat.com DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=redhat.com; s=mimecast20190719; t=1666615253; h=from:from:reply-to:reply-to:subject:subject:date:date: message-id:message-id:to:to:cc:mime-version:mime-version: content-type:content-type:in-reply-to:in-reply-to: references:references; bh=ZNwyNIiAqHrOFFHsaW7SbHXz3nBlp5+ZxTQTnYJY9mM=; b=gnf5m6vkTQsQ0jcBZKh/QkM1G/qOwYFyPJUJzq9ci5Yus2/R808ihVz59pTPMFFW5D+doU OAocJ7Os1M3rNtH6TOulmL6x7QGzb3DDdR71/c0sgIMloAqRZNwUuZ7wiaYQhORMUA2VCn vCHK+7+Is0/Ysepgup5Fy1eZ9XJB2yM= Received: from mimecast-mx02.redhat.com (mimecast-mx02.redhat.com [66.187.233.88]) by relay.mimecast.com with ESMTP with STARTTLS (version=TLSv1.2, cipher=TLS_ECDHE_RSA_WITH_AES_256_GCM_SHA384) id us-mta-649-JDlJynVROsS36BI4wgnu_g-1; Mon, 24 Oct 2022 08:40:52 -0400 X-MC-Unique: JDlJynVROsS36BI4wgnu_g-1 Received: from smtp.corp.redhat.com (int-mx10.intmail.prod.int.rdu2.redhat.com [10.11.54.10]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher AECDH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by mimecast-mx02.redhat.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 5BF518027EB for ; Mon, 24 Oct 2022 12:40:52 +0000 (UTC) Received: from calimero.vinschen.de (unknown [10.39.193.22]) by smtp.corp.redhat.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 38AF9492B0A for ; Mon, 24 Oct 2022 12:40:52 +0000 (UTC) Received: by calimero.vinschen.de (Postfix, from userid 500) id 0232CA80CFE; Mon, 24 Oct 2022 14:40:50 +0200 (CEST) Date: Mon, 24 Oct 2022 14:40:50 +0200 From: Corinna Vinschen To: overseers@sourceware.org Subject: Re: Toolchain Infrastructure project statement of support Message-ID: Reply-To: overseers@sourceware.org Mail-Followup-To: overseers@sourceware.org References: <2513b668-9ebd-9e78-7263-dc24f4a9558a@redhat.com> <20221013182529.sm76fysq37sv754x@cgf.cx> <9c0a9111-07b1-3617-c5c8-4b12e616f985@gotplt.org> <7abeb179-2c05-eee9-bd68-3b5f8a11bd32@gotplt.org> <87zgdmyg30.fsf@fsf.org> <230909ee-fb2c-cca0-abbe-fd7d6434efab@gotplt.org> <20221023151640.GA8034@redhat.com> <0bac951e-8f5e-deb6-c126-26d5fbd0bbfe@gotplt.org> MIME-Version: 1.0 In-Reply-To: <0bac951e-8f5e-deb6-c126-26d5fbd0bbfe@gotplt.org> X-Scanned-By: MIMEDefang 3.1 on 10.11.54.10 X-Mimecast-Spam-Score: 0 X-Mimecast-Originator: redhat.com Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Disposition: inline X-Spam-Status: No, score=-5.0 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00,DKIMWL_WL_HIGH,DKIM_SIGNED,DKIM_VALID,DKIM_VALID_AU,DKIM_VALID_EF,RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE,RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_H2,SPF_HELO_NONE,SPF_NONE,TXREP autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no version=3.4.6 X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.6 (2021-04-09) on server2.sourceware.org List-Id: On Oct 23 12:07, Siddhesh Poyarekar via Overseers wrote: > I am not aware of any opposition from maintainers of libabigail or cygwin or > any other active sourceware based project over moving either, but I haven't > had any links to those projects, so I may be uninformed. For the time being, as the project lead, I hearby declare that Cygwin and the cygwin.com domain wants to stay on Sourceware. We have exactly what we need on sware, so I don't see any reason to move infrastructure to another entity, which we, in fact, don't really know much about, and which may just add additional red tape. "For the time being", because I didn't take the prospect of moving sware in its entirety to some 3-rd part service really serious. I still have to discuss this with other Cygwin maintainers, but I have a hard time to see that there's any real advantage for Cygwin. Corinna