From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from us-smtp-delivery-124.mimecast.com (us-smtp-delivery-124.mimecast.com [170.10.129.124]) by sourceware.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 186363858D1E for ; Wed, 21 Dec 2022 08:54:46 +0000 (GMT) DMARC-Filter: OpenDMARC Filter v1.4.1 sourceware.org 186363858D1E Authentication-Results: sourceware.org; dmarc=pass (p=none dis=none) header.from=redhat.com Authentication-Results: sourceware.org; spf=pass smtp.mailfrom=redhat.com DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=redhat.com; s=mimecast20190719; t=1671612885; h=from:from:reply-to:reply-to:subject:subject:date:date: message-id:message-id:to:to:cc:mime-version:mime-version: content-type:content-type:in-reply-to:in-reply-to: references:references; bh=HenJLkY7j0wLc9rzvqyohE/QYblwSHV+hJvpXlVFIhY=; b=aLbg7QYxlhGH7xb9cUElbq+rP67oOO3qticKW4exJXZEqBbf0Iyu7QoUIpJvP0fl7hDvE0 pkwS2pdTLhJDS9MAWvmTUUZ6xqhpKEkOZdEZMxPWaMsxnBL3bAzeDFk72pGu1SWMo4fca3 8Zgf5/faDd4Ph+iMkzEKVhxCnqxUVLo= Received: from mimecast-mx02.redhat.com (mx3-rdu2.redhat.com [66.187.233.73]) by relay.mimecast.com with ESMTP with STARTTLS (version=TLSv1.2, cipher=TLS_ECDHE_RSA_WITH_AES_256_GCM_SHA384) id us-mta-511-du1BfxDWM1mwB9EZCRHnkQ-1; Wed, 21 Dec 2022 03:54:44 -0500 X-MC-Unique: du1BfxDWM1mwB9EZCRHnkQ-1 Received: from smtp.corp.redhat.com (int-mx03.intmail.prod.int.rdu2.redhat.com [10.11.54.3]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher AECDH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by mimecast-mx02.redhat.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 4B61E3814593 for ; Wed, 21 Dec 2022 08:54:44 +0000 (UTC) Received: from calimero.vinschen.de (unknown [10.39.193.230]) by smtp.corp.redhat.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 274D0112132C for ; Wed, 21 Dec 2022 08:54:44 +0000 (UTC) Received: by calimero.vinschen.de (Postfix, from userid 500) id B09BEA80742; Wed, 21 Dec 2022 09:54:42 +0100 (CET) Date: Wed, 21 Dec 2022 09:54:42 +0100 From: Corinna Vinschen To: overseers@sourceware.org Subject: Re: [PATCH] fhandler/proc.cc(format_proc_cpuinfo): add Linux 6.1 cpuinfo Message-ID: Reply-To: overseers@sourceware.org Mail-Followup-To: overseers@sourceware.org References: MIME-Version: 1.0 In-Reply-To: X-Scanned-By: MIMEDefang 3.1 on 10.11.54.3 X-Mimecast-Spam-Score: 0 X-Mimecast-Originator: redhat.com Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Disposition: inline X-Spam-Status: No, score=-5.1 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00,DKIMWL_WL_HIGH,DKIM_SIGNED,DKIM_VALID,DKIM_VALID_AU,DKIM_VALID_EF,RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE,RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_H2,SPF_HELO_NONE,SPF_NONE,TXREP autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no version=3.4.6 X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.6 (2021-04-09) on server2.sourceware.org List-Id: On Dec 21 00:33, Mark Wielaard via Overseers wrote: > Hi Corinna, > > On Tue, Dec 20, 2022 at 09:49:37AM +0100, Corinna Vinschen via Overseers wrote: > > [Cc overseers, please see especially the end of this mail] > > I haven't had time to look at all issues, but... > > > On Dec 19 15:37, Brian Inglis wrote: > > > On 2022-12-19 02:13, Corinna Vinschen wrote: > > > > On Dec 17 14:50, Brian Inglis wrote: > > > > > > I also have a number of emails to Cygwin list owners awaiting moderation by > > > postmaster-owner@sourceware.org. > > > > I hope overseers can look into that. > > > > I don't understand how your posts could end up at postmaster-owner. > > They should have ended up at cygwin-patches-owner instead. > > This I can explain. One of the cygwin-patches-owners is > listadmin@sourceware.org which is really an alias for postmaster, > which is its own mailman list these days. Which is not very convenient > since mailman gets confused about the alias, because it doesn't see > itself (postmaster@) as recipient. > > We should provide something better for listadmin@, but for now I would > recommend you remove that address under > https://cygwin.com/mailman/admin/cygwin-patches/?VARHELP=general/owner Ok, I'll do that. However, we should have a generic list owner account which can be used as placeholder and last chance address if the physical list owners are unavailable for some reason. Corinna