Messages missing from public inbox for <gcc@gcc.gnu.org>

Messages missing from public inbox for <gcc@gcc.gnu.org>

[Thomas Schwinge]

Hi!

On 2022-12-21T09:09:01+0000, Zulip notifications <noreply@zulip.com> wrote:
> Thomas Schwinge:
>> <https://inbox.sourceware.org/gcc/CAGWvny=hTwRZ_FECEbBJR=QUxQZdYX=uWcrq6ymhYyP+_W_BMQ@mail.gmail.com> :tada:
> Marc:
>> Message-ID <CAGWvny=hTwRZ_FECEbBJR=QUxQZdYX=uWcrq6ymhYyP+_W_BMQ@mail.gmail.com>
>> not found
>>
>> Is it working for you?

Eh, indeed the last few (?) messages of <gcc@gcc.gnu.org> seem to be
missing; compare top of <https://inbox.sourceware.org/gcc/> and end of
<https://gcc.gnu.org/pipermail/gcc/2022-December/date.html#end>.


Grüße
 Thomas
-----------------
Siemens Electronic Design Automation GmbH; Anschrift: Arnulfstraße 201, 80634 München; Gesellschaft mit beschränkter Haftung; Geschäftsführer: Thomas Heurung, Frank Thürauf; Sitz der Gesellschaft: München; Registergericht München, HRB 106955

Re: Messages missing from public inbox for <gcc@gcc.gnu.org>

[Mark Wielaard]

Hi Thomas,

On Wed, Dec 21, 2022 at 10:24:38AM +0100, Thomas Schwinge via Overseers wrote:
> On 2022-12-21T09:09:01+0000, Zulip notifications <noreply@zulip.com> wrote:
> > Thomas Schwinge:
> >> <https://inbox.sourceware.org/gcc/CAGWvny=hTwRZ_FECEbBJR=QUxQZdYX=uWcrq6ymhYyP+_W_BMQ@mail.gmail.com> :tada:
> > Marc:
> >> Message-ID <CAGWvny=hTwRZ_FECEbBJR=QUxQZdYX=uWcrq6ymhYyP+_W_BMQ@mail.gmail.com>
> >> not found
> >>
> >> Is it working for you?
> 
> Eh, indeed the last few (?) messages of <gcc@gcc.gnu.org> seem to be
> missing; compare top of <https://inbox.sourceware.org/gcc/> and end of
> <https://gcc.gnu.org/pipermail/gcc/2022-December/date.html#end>.

It just happens that the last few messages were sent as HTML
(multipart) emails.  mailman strips the HTML part before sending
through and archiving, but public-inbox rejects such emails
*** We only accept plain-text mail, No HTML ***

The problem with stripping is that it destroys the DKIM signature of
the emails (which is why we need From rewriting). But we might have to
do that for public-inbox too, unless we can convince upstream of
accepting/archiving the HTML multiparts.

Cheers,

Mark