From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from gnu.wildebeest.org (gnu.wildebeest.org [45.83.234.184]) by sourceware.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id D90173858D1E for ; Wed, 21 Dec 2022 09:42:42 +0000 (GMT) DMARC-Filter: OpenDMARC Filter v1.4.1 sourceware.org D90173858D1E Authentication-Results: sourceware.org; dmarc=none (p=none dis=none) header.from=klomp.org Authentication-Results: sourceware.org; spf=pass smtp.mailfrom=klomp.org Received: from reform (deer0x15.wildebeest.org [172.31.17.151]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ADH-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by gnu.wildebeest.org (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id AB67B300071A; Wed, 21 Dec 2022 10:42:39 +0100 (CET) Received: by reform (Postfix, from userid 1000) id BBB372E803C3; Wed, 21 Dec 2022 10:42:38 +0100 (CET) Date: Wed, 21 Dec 2022 10:42:38 +0100 From: Mark Wielaard To: Overseers mailing list Cc: Thomas Schwinge , dkm@kataplop.net Subject: Re: Messages missing from public inbox for Message-ID: References: <0100018533f17a4e-c9c0eff2-d358-49d1-bde5-6df54c81eed5-000000@email.amazonses.com> <87r0wt6re1.fsf@euler.schwinge.homeip.net> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <87r0wt6re1.fsf@euler.schwinge.homeip.net> X-Spam-Status: No, score=-3032.4 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00,JMQ_SPF_NEUTRAL,KAM_DMARC_STATUS,KAM_SHORT,SPF_HELO_NONE,SPF_PASS,TXREP autolearn=no autolearn_force=no version=3.4.6 X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.6 (2021-04-09) on server2.sourceware.org List-Id: Hi Thomas, On Wed, Dec 21, 2022 at 10:24:38AM +0100, Thomas Schwinge via Overseers wrote: > On 2022-12-21T09:09:01+0000, Zulip notifications wrote: > > Thomas Schwinge: > >> :tada: > > Marc: > >> Message-ID > >> not found > >> > >> Is it working for you? > > Eh, indeed the last few (?) messages of seem to be > missing; compare top of and end of > . It just happens that the last few messages were sent as HTML (multipart) emails. mailman strips the HTML part before sending through and archiving, but public-inbox rejects such emails *** We only accept plain-text mail, No HTML *** The problem with stripping is that it destroys the DKIM signature of the emails (which is why we need From rewriting). But we might have to do that for public-inbox too, unless we can convince upstream of accepting/archiving the HTML multiparts. Cheers, Mark