From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from elastic.org (elastic.org [96.126.110.187]) by sourceware.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 4A2063858D35 for ; Thu, 25 Nov 2021 17:54:28 +0000 (GMT) DMARC-Filter: OpenDMARC Filter v1.4.1 sourceware.org 4A2063858D35 Received: from vpn-home.elastic.org ([10.0.0.2] helo=elastic.org) by elastic.org with esmtps (TLS1.2) tls TLS_ECDHE_RSA_WITH_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (Exim 4.94.2) (envelope-from ) id 1mqIx0-00031X-8W; Thu, 25 Nov 2021 17:54:26 +0000 Received: from very.elastic.org ([192.168.1.1]) by elastic.org with esmtp (Exim 4.94.2) (envelope-from ) id 1mqIwz-00042b-OL; Thu, 25 Nov 2021 12:54:25 -0500 Received: from fche by very.elastic.org with local (Exim 4.94.2) (envelope-from ) id 1mqIwz-002yHM-H1; Thu, 25 Nov 2021 12:54:25 -0500 Date: Thu, 25 Nov 2021 12:54:25 -0500 From: "Frank Ch. Eigler" To: Joseph Myers Cc: "Frank Ch. Eigler via Overseers" , Mark Wielaard , Simon Marchi , Joel Brobecker , Pedro Alves Subject: Re: getting spammed on bugzilla Message-ID: References: <6bf0f483-ce3a-3c03-f889-15c8b2eef14f@redhat.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: X-Sender-Verification: "" X-Spam-Status: No, score=-98.8 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00, DKIM_SIGNED, DKIM_VALID, DKIM_VALID_AU, DKIM_VALID_EF, SPF_HELO_PASS, SPF_PASS, TXREP, USER_IN_WELCOMELIST, USER_IN_WHITELIST, WEBMAIL_BODY autolearn=no autolearn_force=no version=3.4.4 X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.4 (2020-01-24) on server2.sourceware.org X-BeenThere: overseers@sourceware.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29 Precedence: list List-Id: Overseers mailing list List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 25 Nov 2021 17:54:29 -0000 Hi - On Thu, Nov 25, 2021 at 05:49:39PM +0000, Joseph Myers wrote: > [...] > > Ummmmmmmmmmmm about that. How is this part supposed to work on gcc's > > bugzilla? I just made myself a test user there, with no one else's > > approval [...] > > See extensions/GCC/lib/Constants.pm, BLACKLISTED_DOMAINS. The idea is > that users of a range of typically free webmail domains have to go through > the manual account creation process, while users with other domains > (personal, corporate, academic, etc.) can typically create their own > accounts without needing manual approval. [...] Ah. My vanity domain must not be blacklisted, whew. After that email, earlier today, I "fixed" gcc bugzilla to direct all account requests through to the gcc bugzilla-account-requester list. Would you like this set back, or shall we try the new non-discriminating "everyone gets to ask" format for a while? - FChE