From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from gnu.wildebeest.org (gnu.wildebeest.org [45.83.234.184]) by sourceware.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 3E72F382CC84 for ; Tue, 7 Jun 2022 07:18:04 +0000 (GMT) DMARC-Filter: OpenDMARC Filter v1.4.1 sourceware.org 3E72F382CC84 Received: from reform (deer0x09.wildebeest.org [172.31.17.139]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ADH-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by gnu.wildebeest.org (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 6CD2E3000B37; Tue, 7 Jun 2022 09:18:02 +0200 (CEST) Received: by reform (Postfix, from userid 1000) id 3CB682E8025F; Tue, 7 Jun 2022 09:17:46 +0200 (CEST) Date: Tue, 7 Jun 2022 09:17:46 +0200 From: Mark Wielaard To: Overseers mailing list Cc: Florian Weimer Subject: Re: Message not distributed over libc-alpha Message-ID: References: <87leu9otbv.fsf@oldenburg.str.redhat.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <87leu9otbv.fsf@oldenburg.str.redhat.com> X-Spam-Status: No, score=-5.5 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00, JMQ_SPF_NEUTRAL, KAM_DMARC_STATUS, SPF_HELO_NONE, SPF_PASS, TXREP, T_SCC_BODY_TEXT_LINE autolearn=no autolearn_force=no version=3.4.6 X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.6 (2021-04-09) on server2.sourceware.org X-BeenThere: overseers@sourceware.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29 Precedence: list List-Id: Overseers mailing list List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 07 Jun 2022 07:18:10 -0000 Hi Florian, On Tue, Jun 07, 2022 at 08:56:04AM +0200, Florian Weimer via Overseers wrote: > This message > > From: Florian Weimer > Subject: Re: [PATCH v2] elf: Remove one-default-version check when searching > an unversioned symbol > To: Fangrui Song > Cc: Fangrui Song via Libc-alpha > Date: Tue, 31 May 2022 21:39:01 +0200 (6 days, 11 hours, 13 minutes ago) > Message-ID: <87leuhpk4q.fsf@oldenburg.str.redhat.com> > > was not distributed via libc-alpha and did not end up in the archives. As far as I can see this message was distributed via libc-alpha and did end up in the archives: https://sourceware.org/pipermail/libc-alpha/2022-May/139228.html > Could you please have a look if you can find any traces in the logs? > Maybe the problem is on my end. It also should have been delivered to you: May 31 19:39:31 server2 postfix/cleanup[180248]: B3EB5396E06E: message-id=<87leuhpk4q.fsf@oldenburg.str.redhat.com> May 31 19:39:31 server2 postfix/qmgr[2143219]: B3EB5396E06E: from=, size=12883, nrcpt=1 (queue active) May 31 19:39:32 server2 postfix/smtp[139826]: B3EB5396E06E: to=, relay=us-smtp-inbound-1.mimecast.com[207.211.30.221]:25, delay=1, delays=0.1/0/0.25/0.66, dsn=2.0.0, status=sent (250 SmtpThread-7853133-1654025972712@us-mta-435.us.mimecast.lan Received OK [c9an2lwjOZqdrO1WtxvhUg.us435]) Hope that helps. Cheers, Mark