From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from elastic.org (elastic.org [96.126.110.187]) by sourceware.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 729DD3858C2D for ; Tue, 16 Aug 2022 22:10:59 +0000 (GMT) DMARC-Filter: OpenDMARC Filter v1.4.1 sourceware.org 729DD3858C2D Received: from vpn-home.elastic.org ([10.0.0.2] helo=elastic.org) by elastic.org with esmtps (TLS1.2) tls TLS_ECDHE_RSA_WITH_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (Exim 4.95) (envelope-from ) id 1oO4m3-0002fw-2Q; Tue, 16 Aug 2022 22:10:59 +0000 Received: from very.elastic.org ([192.168.1.1]) by elastic.org with esmtp (Exim 4.94.2) (envelope-from ) id 1oO4m2-000IcL-Jy; Tue, 16 Aug 2022 18:10:58 -0400 Received: from fche by very.elastic.org with local (Exim 4.95) (envelope-from ) id 1oO4m2-00GmUq-IB; Tue, 16 Aug 2022 18:10:58 -0400 Date: Tue, 16 Aug 2022 18:10:58 -0400 From: "Frank Ch. Eigler" To: Overseers mailing list Cc: Mark Wielaard , Simon Marchi Subject: Re: inbox.sourceware.org experiment Message-ID: References: <20220813141403.GL5520@gnu.wildebeest.org> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: X-Sender-Verification: "" X-Spam-Status: No, score=-101.4 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00, DKIM_SIGNED, DKIM_VALID, DKIM_VALID_AU, DKIM_VALID_EF, SPF_HELO_PASS, SPF_PASS, TXREP, T_SCC_BODY_TEXT_LINE, USER_IN_WELCOMELIST, USER_IN_WHITELIST autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no version=3.4.6 X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.6 (2021-04-09) on server2.sourceware.org X-BeenThere: overseers@sourceware.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29 Precedence: list List-Id: Overseers mailing list List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 16 Aug 2022 22:11:01 -0000 Hi - > It turns out public-inbox does support importing a full mbox in one > go. But it doesn't have a nice binary for it yet. There is however > scripts/import_vger_from_mbox in upstream git which is easily adapted > (just remove the vger specific filtering). This is already 99% done for the sourceware mailing lists. > [...] > Note this is V2 plus full indexing and includes and extra historical > elfutils-devel.nospam.mbox Is there a need for "full" indexing as opposed to "basic"? I don't see why we'd need another text search engine for this stuff, we already have. The basic "v1" with basic indexing seems fine and effective for web and nntp. > [...] > I don't have a solution for keeping the archive up to date. [...] We can hack a postfix->|mailman and |inbox-mda alias-fork and dual pipe delivery for each mailing list. - FChE