From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from elastic.org (elastic.org [96.126.110.187]) by sourceware.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 37E3C385829D; Thu, 6 Oct 2022 22:57:43 +0000 (GMT) DMARC-Filter: OpenDMARC Filter v1.4.1 sourceware.org 37E3C385829D Authentication-Results: sourceware.org; dmarc=pass (p=quarantine dis=none) header.from=elastic.org Authentication-Results: sourceware.org; spf=pass smtp.mailfrom=elastic.org DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; q=dns/txt; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=elastic.org ; s=default2; h=In-Reply-To:Content-Type:MIME-Version:References:Message-ID: Subject:Cc:To:From:Date:Sender:Reply-To:Content-Transfer-Encoding:Content-ID: Content-Description:Resent-Date:Resent-From:Resent-Sender:Resent-To:Resent-Cc :Resent-Message-ID:List-Id:List-Help:List-Unsubscribe:List-Subscribe: List-Post:List-Owner:List-Archive; bh=Nlgz4VBRW9T9CeuK50N+R+OK5b+yGkm+cnlXv2M594Q=; b=cB0YaIrfxc6vxA2TorOPYXPRmS RHchY5Uic6Wx4gQzN4rzX4jWXHUZ28mQ32OZVM6il4rFJcs2qHDcWcruYNGrbrmKYC6zak5yVBqZ+ zZqlC2CmHV0lYubjyC19h49qZoP9iAYIo/WiPhtLdxvGFguAzN9hGL58bgY8n/2szurX3tMzsEH+v rDNhvwqfRnjkszV3exWcm3qPAucCo4AdfVBIXqiJcLGHDp047JtoGMa3ydS65eOVgP8bqcDAqmhox q59DXfOQcRPOSwT3vMXNkJwIvyBNlZ/qveR+mFDYkyLOCn9bqnPOMWo6/1x0HV4b5RG4TEJFd8Lic YmxFYU0Q==; Received: from vpn-home.elastic.org ([10.0.0.2] helo=elastic.org) by elastic.org with esmtps (TLS1.2) tls TLS_ECDHE_RSA_WITH_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (Exim 4.96) (envelope-from ) id 1ogZoE-0001SX-03; Thu, 06 Oct 2022 22:57:42 +0000 Received: from very.elastic.org ([192.168.1.1]) by elastic.org with esmtp (Exim 4.96) (envelope-from ) id 1ogZoD-000BVd-2M; Thu, 06 Oct 2022 18:57:41 -0400 Received: from fche by very.elastic.org with local (Exim 4.96) (envelope-from ) id 1ogZoD-003JIF-2G; Thu, 06 Oct 2022 18:57:41 -0400 Date: Thu, 6 Oct 2022 18:57:41 -0400 From: "Frank Ch. Eigler" To: Overseers mailing list Cc: "Frank Ch. Eigler" , Siddhesh Poyarekar , gdb@sourceware.org, Mark Wielaard , libc-alpha@sourceware.org, binutils@sourceware.org, gcc@gcc.gnu.org Subject: Re: The GNU Toolchain Infrastructure Project Message-ID: References: <6f6d141b-b776-8707-2c91-dc38d20aa9e1@gotplt.org> <20221004171007.oc2ot6eu6l24aipn@cgf.cx> <05b0f7fa-7077-5a8b-0c2f-dfb3068dd10f@gotplt.org> <20221006213621.GA17528@redhat.com> <9af12811-354c-9131-a032-fa2ebacfa40a@gotplt.org> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <9af12811-354c-9131-a032-fa2ebacfa40a@gotplt.org> X-Sender-Verification: "" X-Spam-Status: No, score=-101.6 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00,DKIM_SIGNED,DKIM_VALID,DKIM_VALID_AU,DKIM_VALID_EF,SPF_HELO_PASS,SPF_PASS,TXREP,USER_IN_WELCOMELIST,USER_IN_WHITELIST autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no version=3.4.6 X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.6 (2021-04-09) on server2.sourceware.org List-Id: Hi - > [...] so that we continue to have them involved in the technical > direction of GNU toolchain infrastructure? [...] "continue"? If the nature & degree of involvement we had so far in the LF/GTI process is representative of the future, I'm not sure I can in good faith ask anyone to fund our time on that. Given that you are listed as a TAC member, yet admitted being unclear on some details of the proposal itself, perhaps we're in the same boat. I cannot speak for the toolchain development community -- and have no idea who honestly can -- but I suspect that some of the numerous outstanding questions are material to their eventual decisionmaking on moving their project to a new host - or staying. - FChE