From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 20906 invoked by alias); 6 Feb 2020 15:22:01 -0000 Mailing-List: contact overseers-help@sourceware.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Id: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: , Sender: overseers-owner@sourceware.org Received: (qmail 20883 invoked by uid 89); 6 Feb 2020 15:22:00 -0000 Authentication-Results: sourceware.org; auth=none X-Spam-SWARE-Status: No, score=-4.5 required=5.0 tests=AWL,BAYES_00,RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE autolearn=ham version=3.3.1 spammy=Welcome, our X-HELO: us-smtp-1.mimecast.com Received: from us-smtp-delivery-1.mimecast.com (HELO us-smtp-1.mimecast.com) (207.211.31.120) by sourceware.org (qpsmtpd/0.93/v0.84-503-g423c35a) with ESMTP; Thu, 06 Feb 2020 15:21:59 +0000 DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=redhat.com; s=mimecast20190719; t=1581002517; h=from:from:reply-to:subject:subject:date:date:message-id:message-id: to:to:cc:cc:mime-version:mime-version:content-type:content-type: content-transfer-encoding:content-transfer-encoding: in-reply-to:in-reply-to:references:references; bh=2ZOs0raMlbPEaOEQVEx/u3A31LIVCsP+2pMd4f8VH/s=; b=ElXPVHgWk5sYRIl+jf03ihfke/6AW4cW1xLfcQhBASeLJX4Um2vl+5ItGdgWrhOH/pmbQQ ape6RWWEvZ7ncm9/qiVvibgCepx70QdhnoGCvrg2vZ8jitzTBbJAyZTgEvw0HlfmDy6KBD I4OXqED5J54Fc8mr9yZPp7elWS1Jz3o= Received: from mail-qt1-f198.google.com (mail-qt1-f198.google.com [209.85.160.198]) (Using TLS) by relay.mimecast.com with ESMTP id us-mta-47-ZKH3WmAkNZClp34PiE3pbw-1; Thu, 06 Feb 2020 10:21:42 -0500 Received: by mail-qt1-f198.google.com with SMTP id p12so4038076qtu.6 for ; Thu, 06 Feb 2020 07:21:42 -0800 (PST) Return-Path: Received: from [192.168.1.4] (135-23-175-75.cpe.pppoe.ca. [135.23.175.75]) by smtp.gmail.com with ESMTPSA id w2sm1730913qtd.97.2020.02.06.07.21.40 (version=TLS1_3 cipher=TLS_AES_128_GCM_SHA256 bits=128/128); Thu, 06 Feb 2020 07:21:40 -0800 (PST) Subject: Re: Choice of distribution for new sourceware.org server? To: Lukas Berk Cc: overseers@sourceware.org References: <74e963de-f7c8-33d0-d133-ada427c000a4@redhat.com> <20200206013050.GA16275@cgf.cx> <20200206060547.GA1868@cgf.cx> <87tv4392f0.fsf@redhat.com> From: Carlos O'Donell Message-ID: Date: Thu, 06 Feb 2020 15:22:00 -0000 User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:68.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/68.2.2 MIME-Version: 1.0 In-Reply-To: <87tv4392f0.fsf@redhat.com> X-Mimecast-Spam-Score: 0 X-Mimecast-Originator: redhat.com Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-IsSubscribed: yes X-SW-Source: 2020-q1/txt/msg00074.txt On 2/6/20 10:10 AM, Lukas Berk wrote: > Hi, > > Carlos O'Donell writes: >> On 2/6/20 1:05 AM, Christopher Faylor wrote: > [...] >>> I think I've just convinced myself to look into using postfix and >>> mailman. I'll try to do that in the next few days. >> >> I think switching to postfix would really be to our benefit, both >> from an upstream support, and long-term perspective. >> >> The archives will be an interesting challenge, but I think we can >> preserve them statically. >> >> Have you seen public inbox? It's amazingly fast and the kernel is >> using it now. There is even a libc-alpha archive: >> https://public-inbox.org/libc-alpha/ > > Weren't we just discussing (in a parallel thread) the maintenance cost > and additional overhead of using out-of-distro bits and pieces? We > should be careful and use the same evaluation when proposing to introduce > further new pieces. True! Welcome to the review committee! ;-) -- Cheers, Carlos.