From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from smtp-out-no.shaw.ca (smtp-out-no.shaw.ca [64.59.134.13]) by sourceware.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 5C7323853800 for ; Sat, 22 May 2021 21:52:32 +0000 (GMT) DMARC-Filter: OpenDMARC Filter v1.3.2 sourceware.org 5C7323853800 Received: from [192.168.1.104] ([68.147.0.90]) by shaw.ca with ESMTP id kZXplS1VQMrQqkZXqlJawj; Sat, 22 May 2021 15:52:31 -0600 X-Authority-Analysis: v=2.4 cv=Nv6yz+RJ c=1 sm=1 tr=0 ts=60a97d1f a=T+ovY1NZ+FAi/xYICV7Bgg==:117 a=T+ovY1NZ+FAi/xYICV7Bgg==:17 a=IkcTkHD0fZMA:10 a=iMpC6L0jGsNNbTZxuiUA:9 a=QEXdDO2ut3YA:10 Reply-To: cygwin@cygwin.com Subject: Re: Too important To: cygwin@cygwin.com References: Cc: Overseers mailing list From: Brian Inglis Organization: Systematic Software Message-ID: Date: Sat, 22 May 2021 15:52:29 -0600 User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 10.0; Win64; x64; rv:78.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/78.10.2 MIME-Version: 1.0 In-Reply-To: Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8; format=flowed Content-Language: en-CA Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-CMAE-Envelope: MS4xfKoScQUR2+bryF5gGN9Mpo2lla7EDMnFMmcLURjArW6zz26QKCy3IuzOutiyl/mOHL47HiIs0TJxwzMcxm+sWPNIgI66MS5MFnCTSteqv8eAzgk6Jtry jQTFE01nnz2maiJDcWRV8CBTKBT/N2DCUjthLuKqG2NFcnlbdTLRlaE+Ob1HC+CUbM3R83GeFBMLX9ZhbKpgM+z1P3cgMjI5/v7beS451UdKwkOXop5fxtVI X-Spam-Status: No, score=0.7 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00, KAM_DMARC_STATUS, KAM_LAZY_DOMAIN_SECURITY, NICE_REPLY_A, RCVD_IN_BARRACUDACENTRAL, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW, RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_H2, SPF_HELO_NONE, SPF_NONE, TXREP autolearn=no autolearn_force=no version=3.4.2 X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.2 (2018-09-13) on server2.sourceware.org X-BeenThere: overseers@sourceware.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29 Precedence: list List-Id: Overseers mailing list List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sat, 22 May 2021 21:52:33 -0000 Seems to me somebody needs to bump up the spam milters to high! A number of useful terms to add are included in the original email. On 2021-05-22 12:40, Noland wrote: ...... -- Take care. Thanks, Brian Inglis, Calgary, Alberta, Canada This email may be disturbing to some readers as it contains too much technical detail. Reader discretion is advised. [Data in binary units and prefixes, physical quantities in SI.]