public inbox for overseers@sourceware.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Joseph Myers <joseph@codesourcery.com>
To: "Frank Ch. Eigler via Overseers" <overseers@sourceware.org>
Cc: "Frank Ch. Eigler" <fche@elastic.org>,
	Joel Brobecker <brobecker@adacore.com>,
	Mark Wielaard <mark@klomp.org>,
	Simon Marchi <simon.marchi@polymtl.ca>,
	Pedro Alves <pedro@palves.net>
Subject: Re: getting spammed on bugzilla
Date: Thu, 25 Nov 2021 17:59:08 +0000	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <alpine.DEB.2.22.394.2111251758110.1751940@digraph.polyomino.org.uk> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <YZ/N0TudlvN/Vtzn@elastic.org>

On Thu, 25 Nov 2021, Frank Ch. Eigler via Overseers wrote:

> Hi -
> 
> On Thu, Nov 25, 2021 at 05:49:39PM +0000, Joseph Myers wrote:
> > [...]
> > > Ummmmmmmmmmmm about that.  How is this part supposed to work on gcc's
> > > bugzilla?  I just made myself a test user there, with no one else's
> > > approval [...]
> > 
> > See extensions/GCC/lib/Constants.pm, BLACKLISTED_DOMAINS.  The idea is 
> > that users of a range of typically free webmail domains have to go through 
> > the manual account creation process, while users with other domains 
> > (personal, corporate, academic, etc.) can typically create their own 
> > accounts without needing manual approval.  [...]
> 
> Ah.  My vanity domain must not be blacklisted, whew.  After that
> email, earlier today, I "fixed" gcc bugzilla to direct all account
> requests through to the gcc bugzilla-account-requester list.  Would
> you like this set back, or shall we try the new non-discriminating
> "everyone gets to ask" format for a while?

I think it should be set back so account requests are only needed for 
blacklisted domains such as gmail.com.

-- 
Joseph S. Myers
joseph@codesourcery.com

  reply	other threads:[~2021-11-25 17:59 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 19+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2021-11-11  3:29 Joel Brobecker
2021-11-11  3:47 ` Andrew Pinski
2021-11-12  4:40   ` Joel Brobecker
2021-11-12  8:55     ` Mark Wielaard
2021-11-12 13:26       ` Carlos O'Donell
2021-11-22  4:03         ` Joel Brobecker
2021-11-24 10:09           ` Mark Wielaard
2021-11-24 14:55             ` Frank Ch. Eigler
2021-11-24 23:40               ` Mark Wielaard
2021-11-25  0:19                 ` Frank Ch. Eigler
2021-11-25 17:49                   ` Joseph Myers
2021-11-25 17:54                     ` Frank Ch. Eigler
2021-11-25 17:59                       ` Joseph Myers [this message]
2021-11-28 17:01                   ` Mark Wielaard
2021-11-28 17:35                     ` Frank Ch. Eigler
2021-11-28 18:07                       ` Mark Wielaard
2021-11-29 17:12                         ` Joseph Myers
2021-12-17  2:50                           ` Joel Brobecker
2021-12-17 17:19                             ` Frank Ch. Eigler

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=alpine.DEB.2.22.394.2111251758110.1751940@digraph.polyomino.org.uk \
    --to=joseph@codesourcery.com \
    --cc=brobecker@adacore.com \
    --cc=fche@elastic.org \
    --cc=mark@klomp.org \
    --cc=overseers@sourceware.org \
    --cc=pedro@palves.net \
    --cc=simon.marchi@polymtl.ca \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for read-only IMAP folder(s) and NNTP newsgroup(s).