From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (qmail 29462 invoked by alias); 1 Oct 2009 21:11:47 -0000 Received: (qmail 29452 invoked by uid 22791); 1 Oct 2009 21:11:47 -0000 X-SWARE-Spam-Status: No, hits=-2.6 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00,SPF_HELO_PASS,SPF_PASS X-Spam-Check-By: sourceware.org Received: from mx1.redhat.com (HELO mx1.redhat.com) (209.132.183.28) by sourceware.org (qpsmtpd/0.43rc1) with ESMTP; Thu, 01 Oct 2009 21:11:41 +0000 Received: from int-mx05.intmail.prod.int.phx2.redhat.com (int-mx05.intmail.prod.int.phx2.redhat.com [10.5.11.18]) by mx1.redhat.com (8.13.8/8.13.8) with ESMTP id n91LBcLK019446; Thu, 1 Oct 2009 17:11:39 -0400 Received: from blade.rdu.redhat.com (blade.rdu.redhat.com [10.11.236.72]) by int-mx05.intmail.prod.int.phx2.redhat.com (8.13.8/8.13.8) with ESMTP id n91LBbSu026502 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA bits=256 verify=NO); Thu, 1 Oct 2009 17:11:38 -0400 Date: Thu, 01 Oct 2009 21:11:00 -0000 From: Matthew Galgoci To: "Frank Ch. Eigler" cc: Eric Brown , overseers@sourceware.org, Jonathan Pickard , ian@airs.com Subject: Re: Required host migration (Sourceware) In-Reply-To: <20091001192043.GA32049@redhat.com> Message-ID: References: <4AC25F6E.6050208@redhat.com> <20091001180237.GD20893@redhat.com> <4AC4F8D6.7070200@redhat.com> <20091001191144.GA22850@ednor.casa.cgf.cx> <20091001192043.GA32049@redhat.com> User-Agent: Alpine 2.00 (LFD 1167 2008-08-23) MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII Mailing-List: contact overseers-help@sourceware.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Id: List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: , Sender: overseers-owner@sourceware.org X-SW-Source: 2009-q4/txt/msg00005.txt.bz2 > Date: Thu, 1 Oct 2009 15:20:43 -0400 > From: Frank Ch. Eigler > To: Eric Brown , overseers@sourceware.org, > Jonathan Pickard , > Matthew Galgoci , ian@airs.com > Subject: Re: Required host migration (Sourceware) > > Hi - > > cgf wrote: > > > mgalgoci wrote: > > > I would rather see us expend our effort on the new setup and suggest we take > > > one of the lighter used servers and migrate it before the other two and setup > > > some preliminary services on it. Make sense? > > Unfortunately sourceware is not set up to be easily segmented into > partial services. server2 and server3 are too small to even store all > the data. Be that as it may, we can at least stand up so that folks can test connectivity as mentioned earlier. On that server a "sorry" page could be setup indicating that sourceware is in the process of being moved. -- Matthew Galgoci Network Operations Red Hat, Inc 919.754.3700 x43155