From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Return-Path: <macro@linux-mips.org>
Received: from cvs.linux-mips.org (eddie.linux-mips.org [148.251.95.138])
 by sourceware.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id AF9D33858D34
 for <overseers@sourceware.org>; Sun, 19 Jul 2020 20:57:04 +0000 (GMT)
DMARC-Filter: OpenDMARC Filter v1.3.2 sourceware.org AF9D33858D34
Received: (from localhost user: 'macro', uid#1010) by eddie.linux-mips.org
 with ESMTP id S23991915AbgGSU5CJVVlq (ORCPT
 <rfc822;overseers@sourceware.org>); Sun, 19 Jul 2020 22:57:02 +0200
Date: Sun, 19 Jul 2020 21:57:02 +0100 (BST)
Sender: "Maciej W. Rozycki" <macro@linux-mips.org>
From: "Maciej W. Rozycki" <macro@linux-mips.org>
cc: Overseers mailing list <overseers@sourceware.org>,
 overseers@gcc.gnu.org, gcc@gcc.gnu.org
Subject: Re: Separate commit mailing lists for trunk/branches possible?
In-Reply-To: <20200717194816.GA13274@cgf.cx>
Message-ID: <alpine.LFD.2.21.2007192152360.234068@eddie.linux-mips.org>
References: <alpine.LFD.2.21.2007171838300.234068@eddie.linux-mips.org>
 <20200717194816.GA13274@cgf.cx>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII
To: unlisted-recipients:; (no To-header on input)
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.6 required=5.0 tests=BAYES_00, KAM_DMARC_STATUS,
 KAM_LAZY_DOMAIN_SECURITY, KHOP_HELO_FCRDNS, SPAM_TO, SPF_HELO_NONE, SPF_NONE,
 TXREP, UNPARSEABLE_RELAY autolearn=no autolearn_force=no version=3.4.2
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.2 (2018-09-13) on
 server2.sourceware.org
X-BeenThere: overseers@sourceware.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29
Precedence: list
List-Id: Overseers mailing list <overseers.sourceware.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <http://sourceware.org/mailman/options/overseers>,
 <mailto:overseers-request@sourceware.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://sourceware.org/pipermail/overseers/>
List-Post: <mailto:overseers@sourceware.org>
List-Help: <mailto:overseers-request@sourceware.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <http://sourceware.org/mailman/listinfo/overseers>,
 <mailto:overseers-request@sourceware.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Sun, 19 Jul 2020 20:57:06 -0000

On Fri, 17 Jul 2020, Christopher Faylor wrote:

> > Most of this stuff is vendor branch stuff I find completely uninteresting 
> >to me and which from my point of view is a waste of resources.  I could 
> >filter it to /dev/null via `procmail', but that would still be a waste.
> 
> Actually, it seems like a procmail rule would solve your problem.

 Not the issue of wasted resources including the list server processing 
and sending the messages intended to my address, bandwidth and all the 
network equipment involved on the way, and finally the local mail server 
receiving and dispatching the message to `procmail'.  It all does not come 
for free.

  Maciej